Get exclusive CAP network offers from top brands

View CAP Offers

Same Site, different domains. Would it work?

Samma3l asked 3 years ago
I was wondering if someone could give me some info or help.

I have a website up at the moment to which I mainly update. It is the one listed in my signature file but anyway there was one thing I wasn’t sure about and was hoping you guys might be able to help.

I was looking to have another domain point to the site being LinuxOnlineCasinoGuide.com though instead of just pointing to the site, I want it to feature the name Linux Online Casino Guide as well as the site description etc.

Is this possible or am I better off just importing the site to the new name and do something else with the old name, so as to avoid site duplication? The main issue would be setting all the links (wow a heap I know) again, but this wouldn’t take me too long anyway.

Any help or thoughts would be appreciated.

Thanks,

24 Answers
alexross answered 3 years ago
likewise. I give up.
<span title=” title=”” class=”bbcode_smiley” />

@Carlo 131382 wrote:

you were saying that displaying other content by determining the referrer. That is cloaking no buts about it.

Yeah on 2 DIFFERENT DOMAINS- and the content is unique to each domain. you have totally missed the point imo.

Anyway – moving along. Entourage? What’s that. I believe Jane’s addiciton provide the themetune.

Carlo answered 3 years ago
I’m done <span title=” title=”” class=”bbcode_smiley” />

Dominique answered 3 years ago
Guys, Guys, now play nicely!

:hattip:

Carlo answered 3 years ago
Hey – what you said is what is described in Wiki as cloaking and I also believe is “cloaking”, because you were saying that displaying other content by determining the referrer. That is cloaking no buts about it.

It isn’t a bad thing, it’s when people abuse it and take the p*ss. That’s bad. Hey, I am was a Java developer too. The only thing I haven’t tried these days isw C#. No time for it, but I imagine that would be a lot like Java.

I love Ruby, PHP tho, I can you tell I am done arguing? I am trying to change the subject and now I am going to watch Entourage that I tivo’d last night and leave voicemails for all my friends in the UK…

alexross answered 3 years ago
@Carlo 131372 wrote:

weren’t you talking about serving pages based on content?

No. my interpretation was that he wants two sites – the exact same except a few keywords. so 2 seperate domains.

What I was suggesting was an economical way to maintain and serve content to both separate domains. (In fact upon rereading, a 301 was just what he needed- however for the purposes of our discussion / disagreement, assume he wanted two different sites..)

@Carlo 131372 wrote:

I am not exactly a n00b, I have a master degree in software engineering and I was a web and applications developer at a few companies as I eased into online marketing of gaming products…

Well you sound like one. Taling about degrees? wtf! Degrees matter not – I am half way thru a phd – big deal. that’s neither here not there.

@Carlo 131372 wrote:

What are your credentials that make you know more than me? Why don’t you go re-write the wiki! So defensive, it is cloaking, go ask Matt Cutts. By the way, I hope you don’t get the impression that when I say it is cloaking that that’s a bad thing?

My credentials?- I am a SEO Consulatant (god ), Java Coder & Webmaster. As for your “so defensive” comment – I am certainly not going to say black is white to placate you, when clearly it is not.

p.s Screw wikipedia and rewriting their wiki.
p.p.s It’s STILL not cloaking.Cloaking happens on 1 domain where content is served depending on visitor/geo/other factors – as I illustrated above what we are discussing does not.

Carlo answered 3 years ago
weren’t you talking about serving pages based on content?

I am not exactly a n00b, I have a master degree in software engineering and I was a web and applications developer at a few companies as I eased into online marketing of gaming products…

That’s right, you said:

Quote:
What you want to do is check the http referrer – and serve the appropriate text (eg title text, content text) depending on whether its the linux one or not.

and yes, in that article it does say:

Quote:
The decision to cloak or not is often based upon the HTTP referrer,

What are your credentials that make you know more than me? Why don’t you go re-write the wiki! So defensive, it is cloaking, go ask Matt Cutts. By the way, I hope you don’t get the impression that when I say it is cloaking that that’s a bad thing?

alexross answered 3 years ago
I suggest actually reading the article and talking about something which you know about instead of making sweeping statements and linking to a wikipedia article on cloaking. (edit: oops i noticed you quoted it so you obv read some of it..)

anyway…

-So you have 2 identical sites running off the same ip. bluewidgets.com and redwidgets.com

– both are identical except red/blue word is different on each site respectively.

– hacking a server to serve both in 1 go (as it were) to different domains is not cloaking.

the same content is always displayed on bluewidgets.com and the other content on redwidgets.com as before – however this way it is easier to maintain – Let me reiterate: the SAME content is shown to each vistor/UA that visits each site respectively – hence no cloaking. nothing is being hidden from the search engines or selectively served.

Carlo answered 3 years ago
here ya go, it’s all in here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloaking

Quote:
The decision to cloak or not is often based upon the HTTP referrer, the user agent or the visitor’s IP; but more advanced techniques can be also based upon the client’s behaviour analysis after a few page requests: the raw quantity, the sorting of, and latency between subsequent HTTP requests sent to a website’s pages, plus the presence of a check for robots.txt file, are some of the parameters in which search engines spiders differ heavily from a natural user behaviour. The referrer tells the URL of the page on which a user clicked a link to get to the page. Some cloakers will give the fake page to anyone who comes from a web directory website, since directory editors will usually examine sites by clicking on links that appear on a directory web page. Other cloakers give the fake page to everyone except those coming from a major search engine; this makes it harder to detect cloaking, while not costing them many visitors, since most people find websites by using a search engine.

Carlo answered 3 years ago
course it is

alexross answered 3 years ago
no it’s not cloaking

you have 2 diff domain names mapping to the same server

a script on the server reads the domain name, and serves the correct titles/content on THAT domain.

hence no cloaking involved.