Get exclusive CAP network offers from top brands

View CAP Offers

Google Bowling – How most of us are getting screwed over by dirty webmasters

You have affiliate marketing questions. CAP has answers!Category: Search Engine Optimization – (SEO)Google Bowling – How most of us are getting screwed over by dirty webmasters
Professor asked 3 years ago
Here’s are very interesting article from WebPro News:

Quote:
Google Bowling: How Competitors Can Sabotage You
Michael Pedone | Expert Author

Have you heard about the latest “sport” in dirty online business?
It’s called Google Bowling and it represents a gaping flaw in
Google’s system that allows your competitors to sabotage your
site to the point of getting it banned or penalized.

This can’t happen, right? I mean, Google would have us believe
their algorithms are not easily manipulated and that your rankings
are safely under your (and their) control. But in fact there’s a
chink in Google’s armor that can have massive consequences for
any web business unfortunate enough to have aggressive and
unethical competitors.

Here’s the loophole, explained

It all began with Google’s aggressive attempts to curb link
popularity manipulation by penalizing sites that purchase
site- wide text link ads to get lots of incoming links in a
hurry. (eg: If the ad selling site had 1,000 pages, the
advertiser’s link would instantly be on 1,000 pages.)

Google began filtering sites that indulged in this kind of
linkage and either penalized or flat-out removed the site from
its database. Bad news for that business. Excellent news for
their competition. Can you guess what’s coming next?

Certain scoundrels began thinking: “If buying site-wide text link
ads en masse will get my site into hot water with Google, why
not buy them for my competitor’s site instead? Then just sit back
and wait for Google to solve my number one business headache…
the competition.” (Cue evil laughter sound track.)

This, ladies and gentlemen, is Google Bowling. Simple. Devious.
Devastating. And not just in theory; it’s really happening out
there.

Here at eTrafficJams.com, we are hearing from a lot of businesses
whose sites once enjoyed great rankings (ours included) and now
don’t even show up in Google for their own company name.

A small loophole has turned into a devastating black hole,
sucking in and wiping out countless quality websites in the
process. And it just may be their competitors sending them into
the abyss.

Is your head spinning yet? I mean, it was bad enough knowing that
with every Google update, your business may go up or down in the
rankings depending on the whims of the Google geeks. But now add
into the mix the fact that your competitors also have a hand in
your search engine health and wellness… well, Houston, we have
a problem.

Although this would be a fortuitous time for me to suggest that
the solution to this problem is hiring a reputable SEO firm
(like http://www.eTrafficJams.com) to watch over your rankings, I shall
resist the temptation. Instead, I’d like to offer Google – as if
they’re listening – a simple solution to this nasty problem.

Right now, Google hands out either rewards or harsh penalties for
linking strategies – good rankings to reward good linking
techniques, and penalties, such as the now-infamous sandbox, to
punish un-cool, manipulative linking practices. But there isn’t
any middle ground.

I say why not create a neutral response… a filter that simply
ignores questionable links, neither rewarding nor punishing
them?

1) Innocent victims of Google Bowling don’t get hurt.

2) If the dubious links actually were perpetrated by the business
at the receiving end of them, Google would exclude those links
and the site would gain nothing. It would simply be throwing ad
money out the window (unless, of course, it was buying site-wide
ads in vehicles that generated relevant traffic). And

3) Google’s reputation for delivering accurate and fair search
results would be restored.

Google needs to do something soon to plug this loophole, not just
for the immediate relief of its users but for its own credibility

Although being “Google Bowled” by a competitor and having your
site removed from the database could ruin a small business, the
consequences for Google could be just as dire. If chatter picks
up that Google’s results are easy to manipulate and consequently
inaccurate, users may be scared away to other search engines.

Fewer users = fewer clicks on ads = lower revenues. Well, I don’t
have to spell that out for the financial wizards at Google.

But just think: a few stories on the big TV networks, say on
MSNBC (*cough* think Bill Gates’ MSN Search, a major Google
competitor), revealing how the new sport of Google Bowling is
sweeping the nation… well, the average user at home may start
to have doubts about Google and maybe decide to try out Yahoo! or
MSN Search.

Is it really that far-fetched to speculate that someone like oh,
I don’t know, Mr. Gates, might take advantage of this situation to
solve his number one business headache… the competition?

So I suggest a simple solution to Google’s link bowling problem:
neutralize suspicious links so they are neither helpful nor
harmful. Problem solved. Sorry, Mr. Gates. © 2005, Michael Pedone

37 Answers
bingoadvantage answered 3 years ago
I’m certain someone did this to me. My site is linked to by zillions of iexchangelinks and similar pages. Google hates me. Is there anything I can do about this?

Big Fish answered 3 years ago
:rollover:

JCimrman answered 3 years ago
On a serious note, greek, which of these formats do you believe is more search engine friendly:

A) dogshitgambling.com/scraper-heaven.html

<span title=” title=”” class=”bbcode_smiley” /> dogshitgambling.com/scraper-heaven/
(where the file is named ‘index’ or ‘default’ or whatever your server likes)

In other words, does a directory name count more than a file name?

Greek39 answered 3 years ago
I would pick A

webber286 answered 3 years ago
I would think the filename is more important since that gives a search engine some information on what the specific page is about.

ioc answered 3 years ago
A will be useful for your website.

kwblue answered 3 years ago
This is a VERY old thread <span title=” title=”” class=”bbcode_smiley” />

I wasted my time reading the article (which I am sure I read in 2006) only to later see the date.

Please leave this thread alone so that it doesn’t re-surface and confuse people.

GaryTheScubaGuy answered 3 years ago
@JCimrman 62524 wrote:

On a serious note, greek, which of these formats do you believe is more search engine friendly:

A) dogshitgambling.com/scraper-heaven.html

<span title=” title=”” class=”bbcode_smiley” /> dogshitgambling.com/scraper-heaven/
(where the file is named ‘index’ or ‘default’ or whatever your server likes)

In other words, does a directory name count more than a file name?

No real benefit for search engines. The benefit is that if those terms are searched and you are in the results the keywords are bolded in the URL and will attract more clicks.

CK44m answered 3 years ago
@Greek39 48122 wrote:

Try this, I currently have 500,000 inbound links from scrapers not only that they are also using my domain name. The numbers go up and down by the minute. I all can say is holy sh**. The scrapers are originating from sitepage.nl a Dutch search engine. I would suggest everbody check there inbounds especially on yahoo. The inbounds are from porn site, sports, horseback riding you name it. I can normally deal with ten but 500,000 is little much. greek39

had exactly the same thing with one of my sites – literally for 6 months 80% of the traffic gone and site gone from top spots – approx 60 places down from where it used to be (and it was top 3). i researched the thing and it turned out someone just bowled me – went on a massive spending spree at one of those buy-cheap-$1-links sites and overnight i had about 50k incoming crapy links. and there is nothing, absolutely nothing you can do about it – for even when i did manage to get hold of the owner of that link selling site and he took them off, the objective has been achieved and the penalty to my site already applied.

now here is the worst part – it took me 6 months to bring the site up, and its not even close to where it used to be, right now around 11th-12th spot for the same keyword it used to be top 3.

all that mr gates chit-chat is very fine – but you seem to forget that not all of us have any US exposure. and guess what – all over the old continent there is simply nothing else in terms or search engine then the bitch (g()()gle). even if mr gates decides to do something about it, it will be years before the balance changes over here…

FreePokerLeague answered 3 years ago
greek39 wrote:
Indexing websites is 100% manupulative. The loopholes can never be fixed. The only way to fix the holes is to redesign the whole net.

Mr.Gates is the one I would put my money on, wait and see what msn does.

Morality before money, its that simple. greek39

Agreed, Mr. Gates is the man. Google is lucky he didn’t care so much about search early on, they wouldn’t exist.