- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
Well what do we have here:
Australia Bondi, Australia visited http://www.awaa.com.au
1 hour 59 mins ago IP: 202.6.75.245
Browser: IE version 9.0 running on Win7
Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/5.0)That IP resolves to ITS Management aka Casino Rewards and Rewards Affiliates.
Whoever it was hope they enjoyed the read!
@AussieDave 248224 wrote:
Well what do we have here:
Australia Bondi, Australia visited http://www.awaa.com.au
1 hour 59 mins ago IP: 202.6.75.245
Browser: IE version 9.0 running on Win7
Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/5.0)That IP resolves to ITS Management aka Casino Rewards and Rewards Affiliates.
Whoever it was hope they enjoyed the read!
Just a quick post :
almost the same IP 202.6.75.254 visited my site when searching for “its management”
Casino Rewards / ITS management breaking Australian Gambling Laws | Rogue Casino Programs
What you should start doing is putting up rogue walls.. start putting faces to names.. and naming and shaming. Anice gallery of all the rogue managers and affiliate company owners. That would be a nice touch.
Received $255 today from Rewards Affiliates.
Seems I average these cr#p payments every 6 months or so. Most never exceed $230, so the extra $25, I’ll try not to spend it all at once :pWhile Casino Rewards are no longer accepting Australian sign-ups, clearly they are still accepting bets from Aussies. I sent this affiliate program 1000’s of players, not to mention all the rest they got from casino they bought out.
Around 98% were Australian players and the rest New Zealand.
Yet with all these players I’m lucky to see $500 or $600 a year in commission payments.
Casino Rewards and Rewards Affiliates, the biggest crooks in the online gaming industry!
@societyofslots 248239 wrote:
What you should start doing is putting up rogue walls.. start putting faces to names.. and naming and shaming. Anice gallery of all the rogue managers and affiliate company owners. That would be a nice touch.
Already done that!
Rewards Affiliates & Casino Rewards Name & Shame | Online Casino Industry – Dodgy Casino History
Yep, I get that random ~200 or so payment that gets over the payment threshold. My next updates I will be removing CR from all my sites – they can pay a listing fee if they want to be on my sites in the future. Used to do decent with them years ago, but thanks things went south!
As for their buyouts – I made mid four figures month in and month out with Vegas Affiliates for years then before they closed up shop things tanked via constant winners. Of course none of the players I referred to those casinos over the years play any longer under the Casino Rewards umbrella. IMO Vegas Affiliates were some of the biggest crooks around particularly the way they ended their last year or so in business! I would not trust anyone associated with that company – no one!
Did a drive-by CCC and no redirect to a page stating they don’t accept Australian Players anymore.
Seems these crooks have found another way to steal affiliate referred players even before your tag players download the casino software.
The italics is funny, this group is the worst spammers in the online gaming industry!
@arkyt 248747 wrote:
As for their buyouts – I made mid four figures month in and month out with Vegas Affiliates for years then before they closed up shop things tanked via constant winners. Of course none of the players I referred to those casinos over the years play any longer under the Casino Rewards umbrella. IMO Vegas Affiliates were some of the biggest crooks around particularly the way they ended their last year or so in business!
I would not trust anyone associated with that company – no one!
Is that past and present employees?
@AussieDave 248752 wrote:
Is that past and present employees?
I reckon my comment is more directly pointed to those during the final year or so of that programs existence! I would say any one working for that program during that time frame and anyone who those particular idiots are now working with/for should seriously be suspect and/or deeply vetted!
