- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 14, 2007 at 6:03 am #736675
Anonymous
InactiveWinners are wonderful and desireable. Payout rates should be high and winners plentiful. Winning is a huge part of the entertainment value. Why would anyone play if the experience was all negative?
May 14, 2007 at 4:04 pm #736765Anonymous
InactiveLoL i didnt quit fraise that right. As a player myself I know what casinos are fair and have best odds of paying out. Those are the ones i play at. As an affiliate i want my players to have same chances I just hope not to be wiped out at months end. And would in no way help them to cheat a casino out of money. It just wouldnt benifit me. Not that i want them all to be loosers just Not gonna help them to win.
May 15, 2007 at 10:14 am #736847Anonymous
InactiveI have some sympathy for the casino in so much that it sounds like the s/ware provider has left them in this hole. However, while casinos continue to try and attract punters with “free money”, they have to expect that some players will try to use that for financial gain, and there’s nothing wrong in that if it’s done within the T&C’s.
What the affiliate is doing is clearly unethical, but he’s only passing on information and clearly decided to align himself with the player rather than the casino. Fair enough – you make your own bed in life. What the player is doing may constitute fraud, but if the casino is really struggling, they should stop offering a bonus straight away until it’s sorted – and drop the affiliate like a hot potato. But, IMO, the buck stops with the s/ware provider and the casino should be seeking compensation from the s/ware provider.
May 18, 2007 at 6:45 pm #737319Anonymous
InactiveGuys,
Sorry for jumping in to this thread so late. I have been out of action for a few days.
The main issue that the affiliate manager has pointed out is the affiliates promoting fraudulent traffic and claiming CPA for that. He doesn’t seem to be that concerned about the flaw in the system and players taking advantage of that.
The solution is simple – to discourage the affiliates from sending the fraud traffic. This can be achieved by incorporating a clause (qualifying criteria) in the terms and conditions of CPA deal.
A new player qualifies as a real money player only when he makes a minimum deposit of $50 and wagers the deposit “X” times.
This way any player who makes a deposit and withdraws immediately and just players with the bonus, doesn’t qualify as a real money player. Therefore the affiliate can’t claim a CPA. Since this arrangement wouldn’t be profitable for the affiliate, he would stop promoting fraud players.
To make the terms more airtight, the Affiliate program can introduce a term like – We retain the right to decline admittance to or cancel continued participation in the CPA program. If we determine that you are abusing the program by referring players who are fraudulent in nature, in such event, we reserve the right to transfer your CPA links to our revenue share model with immediate effect.
Hope this helps
Cheers
SatyaMay 18, 2007 at 7:08 pm #737321Anonymous
InactiveI think this program should close an account of this affiliate and explains the reason of the closing that to answer any complaints and bad words from this affiliate. That’s all.
May 18, 2007 at 7:28 pm #737322
vladcizsolMemberThats what they did Aksana
-
AuthorPosts