CPA Vrs Revenue Share

CPA is for suckers and thieves

@Sam David 149922 wrote:

As an Affiliate Manager I can defently say that my affiliates are happier to recieve CPA than Rev Share.
Its always depend on the rate of course but if its good and successful casino there is no reason not to work on CPA.

I have single player accounts that make me $7000+ a month because they are whales. You only need to nail one of these to never think about CPA EVER Again.

As an Affiliate Manager I can defently say that my affiliates are happier to recieve CPA than Rev Share.
Its always depend on the rate of course but if its good and successful casino there is no reason not to work on CPA.

Some of the newer “big name” UK sites are like that I find. They only offer 30 pound cpa that should be a clue too.

@casinoalerts 144580 wrote:

I would make more on one site for bingo taking rev share than CPA wheareas another site I have 22 depositing players and I have made £22 in rev share which has to be wrong

I have to say that for bingo; revenue share, if it is for life is the best way to go.

It all depends on how well the merchant converts their ‘for fun’ players into ‘depositing’ players. If they retain their players, how well they do CRM and what kind of player promotions they offer.

Bingo.com offers a decent rev share of 30% but a CPA offer can be agreed. Most affiliates we speak to are after the rev share and it seems to be paying off. Bingo is a community game, so if the merchant has created a friendly place you player could be there for life. That’s got to be better in the long term.

Stephen

95% from casino 5% from bingo

How much do you take into account the change of people going to play casino or bingo from the same account, like partygaming having it all under 1 roof?

Good post Simmo, the higher raking Poker player earns the operator more than the high rolling Casino player on average – that is true ” title=”” class=”bbcode_smiley” />