- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 20, 2006 at 3:14 pm #689478
Anonymous
InactiveHAHAHA :roflmao:
You have been earning about $50 every month for over a year and the one time somebody actually wins you call the program a crook????
Get real…
Wagershare is one of the best programs around.
April 20, 2006 at 3:33 pm #689479Anonymous
InactiveI had no idea everyone was getting so rich with Poker333
You guys must be gifted :flush:
Maybe one of you geniuses can explain how a player earns a negative rake
Please, i’d love to hear it
April 20, 2006 at 4:33 pm #689480Anonymous
Inactivenick777 wrote:I had no idea everyone was getting so rich with Poker333You guys must be gifted :flush:
Maybe one of you geniuses can explain how a player earns a negative rake
Please, i’d love to hear it
Your going to start insulting other affiliates over $100 now? I believe only one “genius” addressed this thread but Ill answer your question.
1) I didnt see anyone say they were getting rich with Poker333……
2) Poker rooms offer bonus which will put you in the neg temporarily till they burn it up. a $100 poker bonus is VERY attractive IMO and you shouldnt be suprised someone took advantage of the offer.
April 20, 2006 at 4:37 pm #689481Anonymous
InactiveBy the way….
I noticed this
$16 FREE TO NEW PLAYERS, NO DEPOSIT
$111 FREE FOR EVERY 650 HANDS, UP TO $333Front and center in the poker section at Superior Gaming. So what you saying is – you push a $16 free offer (thats expired by the way) in a top position – and your suprised to be in the neg in poker income?
This is all a bad joke right?
April 20, 2006 at 4:43 pm #689482Anonymous
InactiveWagershare is one of the best programs around.
Completely Agree.
April 20, 2006 at 4:59 pm #689483Anonymous
InactiveThere you go
You just said it all
“A $16 free bonus that has expired”
So how is my rake – $12 this month, it was never in the minus before
I didn’t notice any new players(none that claimed a non existing bonus, thats certain)
Since they pay out the bonus in accordance with the amount of raked hands you play, how can it be in the minus
And why is Mr. Wagershare trying to justify it, and say that it is correct
I want to hear someone explain it to me
How can my rake be in the minus ?
Tell me…Anyone
April 20, 2006 at 5:09 pm #689484Anonymous
InactiveHi nick777
As has already been explained to you in another thread and by affiliates here, your poker player has a negative balance because they have been given a bonus. To be more specific, the player in question has been given a $30 bonus and they have raked $18 so far which leaves the player with a current net revenue balance of -$12.
This player is one of your existing players so the bonus must have been from a loyalty manager as opposed to a sign-on bonus.
Regards
Tim Whyles
April 20, 2006 at 5:24 pm #689485Anonymous
InactiveYou can also get a negative rake from a chargeback. But this doesn’t seem to be the case this time.
April 20, 2006 at 5:28 pm #689486Anonymous
InactiveOk Tim
Where is my loyalty bonus ?
Is this a new policy now, should i tell people about it…Hey, go to Poker333, they’ll give you $30 free whenever the hell they feel like it
So how is it a bonus if i’m the one who’s paying for it
Gee, that was nice of me…i had no idea i was giving out free cash to everyone
Who is not making sense here, me or you
April 20, 2006 at 5:35 pm #689487Anonymous
InactiveHi Nick777
OK, you have me quite confused now – are you now asking for a loyalty bonus into your poker account? If so, I would contact the poker room about that as I only deal with the affiliates.
In terms of the bonuses given out by the loyalty team, this is common place and helps the team maintain the loyalty they are put in place to create. Were you unaware that online casinos and poker rooms gave out bonuses to their existing players?
If you need me to explain why bonuses are deducted from the affiliate equation then I can do but it really shouldn’t be necessary.
Regards,
Tim
April 20, 2006 at 5:40 pm #689488Anonymous
InactiveWagerShare wrote:If you need me to explain why bonuses are deducted from the affiliate equation then I can do but it really shouldn’t be necessary.Thats quite normal and helps us affiliates to. I dont get the problem here at all Nick. This is one of the strangest threads I have seen at CAP :notify:
April 20, 2006 at 6:00 pm #689489Anonymous
InactiveThis is an odd thread. I’ll just add that Wagershare has been a great program for us so far. Bonuses given out by programs are a part of the game, nothing new here.
April 20, 2006 at 6:03 pm #689490Anonymous
InactiveOn another note, I really think that loyalty bonuses should NOT come from the affiliates pocket, and should NOT in any way affect aff. commission for the simple fact that if a caisno gives $100 on the 31st to 1,000 of my players – I sure would be left with nothing
Sure, they’ll loose them, but when they do I will not gain anything and a casino could do this all the time (I am pretty sure that there was a group of casinos doing this at one time).The minute I saw my poker commission negative – I switched over to CPA. I think it makes no sence to be negative when you get paid by a hand played…Not a big poker advertiser, though, so it works fine with me. I would much rather get $3-$4K a month than $60-$70…
April 20, 2006 at 6:07 pm #689491Anonymous
InactiveNo, i don’t need a poker bonus, and i don’t need an explanation of why it was given
But since we’re talking business here
It seems as though one of my newer gambling sites is doing ok, thus new players are popping up in my account, even at wagershare
Generally this would mean more money for me, but the only thing thats going up at wagershare is my negative balance, even the ones that were never in the negative(the money mechanic sites)are in the negative now
Is this something i need to be concerned about…do you have the anti-midas touch going for me
Seriously, you can look over the money mechanic stats and compare them to yours, and you will see that my paranoia is not self inflicted
That is all i have to say
If this truly is an act of some divine intervention, then i apologize for suggesting you were conspiring to thief me…yet i am quite superstitious, so if this pattern continues, i will have to axe you, no matter what the reason
Thanks for your time, you were very responsive, which looks good on you
April 20, 2006 at 6:10 pm #689492Anonymous
InactiveLast time I looked, (has been some time) Party Poker let you decide on the bonuses. Maybe that would work for you.
-
AuthorPosts