- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
Well I was really impressed when after not answering the first question, she basically said “I don’t plan on answering the questions you ask me, unless i accidentally stumble onto the answer randomly.”
Frankly i can’t believe the people in the CNN audience with the people meter. Every time she spoke it was a bunch of nonsense babble of a log of words.
“i’m in favor of strength, for people and companies in the fight for strength and in finding more oil to balance our needs of taxes and regulations to be mavericks that will fix the past with new ideas from the Maverick side that we always are more realistically new.”
Once i think she might have actually answered the question asked, but only because of some random neurons firing.
This woman is a moron, she makes Dan Quayle appear well educated and a wordsmith.
well like I said she is an amateur.
Not to defend the Democrats as they have their own set of demons, but I never understood the rationale of Republicans, they preach personal responsibility at home but give the Iraqi’s a pass on it.
They’re mega pro life but kill living creatures for fun and sport.
The don’t believe in global climate change but if you close the windows in your car while its running you’ll last an hour.
If we can invest 700+ billion to save the economy surely we can invest a 150+ billion into getting off the “drill baby drill” mentality once and for all.
They’re mega pro life but kill living creatures for fun and sport.
Well i’ve always been pro-choice and always had a great deal of disdain for the hypocritical Pro Lifers who often support Capital Punishment.
Somehow it’s wrong for a woman to decide to have an abortion, because life is sared, but it’s ok/good to kill a convicted criminal because the jury voted to.
The Catholic Church, which i have no love for, is consistantly pro life, they are against abortion and capital punishment. Though I may be a pro choice, aethiest, I applaud the church for it’s consistancy and it’s understanding of basic logic in this case.
What gets me is how you can compare someon with 5 weeks on the national scene vs. someone with 35 years.
By the way, Yahoo had the debate at 48% to 49% before removing the stats from their pageWhat gets me is how you can compare someon with 5 weeks on the national scene vs. someone with 35 years.
By the way, Yahoo had the debate at 48% to 49% before removing the stats from their page.
You would also think that after 35 years in Washington, a person would know the Constitution!@bleuze 179004 wrote:
What gets me is how you can compare someon with 5 weeks on the national scene vs. someone with 35 years.
By the way, Yahoo had the debate at 48% to 49% before removing the stats from their pageThat’s the point. 5 weeks is crazy and she is NOT qualified to be VP and knows VERY little about the economy or much else other than energy.
We don’t need a beauty queen/hockey mom/pitbull in lipstick/Joe Six Pack with NUKE codes.
The state of the US is in serious shape and it’s time that folks wake up and realize that ISSUES matter.
She is almost as sharp as Obama on all those is what your sayin? lol…
Oh God were all in trouble either way here
@allfreechips 179010 wrote:
She is almost as sharp as Obama on all those is what your sayin? lol…
Oh God were all in trouble either way here
McPalin folks are blind so what difference does it make? LMAO Palin is a bumbling disaster when she is not cue carded up!
Obama can articulate his thoughts!
thats why Taxmaster Obama needs a teleprompter on the road i guess
You’re correct. I’m glad that you are admiting that. That’s why Obama is not qualified either. At least McCain is head of the ticket.
By the way, you might want to read this article http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=C0A24200-18FE-70B2-A8A7493B20F107AF
@allfreechips 179016 wrote:
thats why Taxmaster Obama needs a teleprompter on the road i guess
Obama’s plan does not increase taxes except for the very, very wealthy. It’s especially beneficial for the middle class. Besides, someone has to pay for 8 years of disastrous, reckless spending. McCain/Failin will continue down the same road as Bush & drive us further into debt. Simply cutting earmark spending, McCain’s hallmark issue, is a drop in the bucket compared to the overall budget & will not make any difference.
From the Washington Post (Tax Policy Center):
Yes,
I guess it is where your coming from. If you like paying for the 700 billion bailout, you’re for Obama and his fellow party members that said that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac did not need any regulation and were fine – although, I think they were blindeda little by the money they were receiving!
Alot on theleft believ in socialism and free hand outs also and that hard wor is for suckers only!@Erik 179019 wrote:
Obama’s plan does not increase taxes except for the very, very wealthy. It’s especially beneficial for the middle class.
Thanks for stating the FACTS! I’m so sick of folks lying about that!!! It’s NOT true folks so don’t fall for it.
We ALL are going to pay for the bailout! It was passed and McPalin voted for it.
