- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 20, 2006 at 5:53 pm #696153
Anonymous
InactiveOk so after some time to allow some good testing I came to a final verdict about who is the best after about 500 real signups in each.
Casino Classic is the winner with an 8.77% conversion rate.
while Mummys Gold has lost with aa 3.61% conversion rate.
even with their horrible earning model classic can easily beat Mummy’s in terms of bottom line as they have almost 3x the conversion into new players.
BTW I have no idea what they do differently in order to capture 3x more players into new depositors since they are both Microgaming.
June 20, 2006 at 5:57 pm #696156Anonymous
InactiveThe offers are a bit different.
June 21, 2006 at 2:12 am #696231Anonymous
InactiveYes, it looks to me that classic casino is definatly an easier promotion to get new depositers as they have a $20 first deposit to claim the bonus. I am curious though on your per player average earning. As to compare the “wager model” to the revenue share. I just have a feeling that revenue share is better for the affiliate then the “wager model”. I just don’t think programs would find a better way to give their affiliate more money… I know earnings will never be negative but that wasn’t a problem before I still made much more before even with the negatives of some players. I know it will be better for some but I wish there was a way to choose a model because I know I would go revenue share. It makes me think they are phasing out revenue share for a reason…the only reason I can think of they make more money with affiliates on wager model.
June 21, 2006 at 2:47 am #696233Anonymous
InactiveI make more than double per player at CR. Thats because I had a winner or two at mummy.
-
AuthorPosts