- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
Classics, Mummies and Riverbelle all do extremely well with this promo.
Classics has done best by me.
One difference is that classic lets players recieve their bonus money after the promotion with only a $20 deposit while mfor ummy it is a $50 dollar deposit…. Which I think makes a difference
Just went through my account and saw that classic is converting 12% of all players who take the promotion into depositing players.
Does anyone have some solid data for Mummys Gold?!
For me, ALL of these offers convert like gangbusters.
The conversion rates are extremey close and high, and I am looking at second deposits here.
Mummy’s Gold Promo
Pre-June 2006
4% conversionJune 2006
17% conversionTotal numbers
8% conversionNo significant data for Classic, as I do not run the promotion very much. I think the May numbers are skewed by a player signing up for many multiple accounts.
At the moment I have 34 new accounts at Mummy’s…
No depositors yet. Let me give it some appropriate time. Currently classic is the winner for me
I think a lot of it depends on if you have players who get lucky. The real question will be which, if either, casino retains players best and gets multiple depositors.
Time will tell…
good news! Got my first 2 purchasing accounts on Mummy’s
at the moment they have me a 3.7% conversion. It’s really early to tell which one will go better.
I will need at least 1 month to have some reliable data to compare.
I will keep you guys posted once I have something.
263 depositors at Mummys Gold in May, conv = 5%
24 depositors at Casino Classic, conv = 3.5%
but total profit is comparable
You mean Mummy’s outbeats Classic even with their low 25% comission!?
Classic has the true wager model which does suck.
I just looked and the bottomline and Classics for this month so far is twice that of Mummies.
But Classics started with more players.
I have the bad habit of just going by bottom line. Or maybe in the long run that’s a good habit.
Bet22 wrote:You mean Mummy’s outbeats Classic even with their low 25% comission!?Classic has the true wager model which does suck.
I couldn’t agree more.
Wager Share 25% definitely outbeats Casino Rewards true wager model for me. Since they changed it to true wager.. They do suck..
How 25% can be better than 30 to 35% beats me, but then I am not into the math, just the bottom line.
That is not to say that Mummy isn’t performing nicely. The Referback properties are performing nicely too, as is Fortune.
It seems like whatever properties with this type promo I put up, they rock!
Dominique wrote:How 25% can be better than 30 to 35% beats me, but then I am not into the math, just the bottom line.I’m looking at the bottom line too.
My bottom line says with no doubt : 25% Revshare > 35% Wager share
That may sound odd but that’s as simple as it getsI finally came to a verdict.
After 150+ new real accounts at both casinos here is the bottom line:
Mummy’s Gold = 3.3% Conversion
Casino Classic = 8.6% Conversion
Conversion I mean real players into depositing new accounts.
