- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 19, 2007 at 10:50 pm #731201
Anonymous
Inactivewhats up with all the good news lately?
March 19, 2007 at 11:13 pm #731204Anonymous
InactiveOk, this is older, 2002, but still stands today, it has not been changed from what I can find.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/5th/0130389p.pdf
The article referring to it is current.
March 19, 2007 at 11:54 pm #731209
vladcizsolMemberThe good guys do win in the long run chips. The bad guys took their best shot and most of us are still standing.
I believe we are going to see things turn around the good news of late is a hint at whats to come.
March 20, 2007 at 12:00 am #731211Anonymous
InactiveThe Port Security law still stands where it stood yesterday though right? So so far nothing here is changed?
LadyH
March 20, 2007 at 12:02 am #731212
vladcizsolMemberLady H Rome wasnt built in a day. It was built one brick at a time. The current bricks we are seeing laid in these posts of good news will result in a positive change over the long run. Give it time.
March 20, 2007 at 12:29 am #731214Anonymous
InactiveHehe, sorry if i sounded negative, I have no patience for legal jargan, and honestly, was looking for an answer
.. though, i tend to be impatient in general, so it was a safe enuff assumption 
LadyH
March 20, 2007 at 12:30 am #731215Anonymous
Inactiveim confident we will win, just need to hury the hell up
March 20, 2007 at 12:42 am #731216Anonymous
InactiveEvery positive mention in the mass media is a brick to build our house with.
March 20, 2007 at 1:09 am #731221Anonymous
InactiveThe Port Act still looms over us.
As our new friend Rep Frank starts talking about overturning the law — or just making it more realistic — Jon Kyl has been spreading his bull turds again. Well, I’m already pissed off 90% of the time these days, so bad move Jonny.
Expect a new APCW Dirt Video on Jon Kyl this week. We’re gonna blast that SOB’s reputation back to the stone age. :hehe:
March 20, 2007 at 1:16 am #731222
vladcizsolMemberQuote:We’re gonna blast that SOB’s reputation back to the stone age.
We just can’t win can we? First the lizard shits on us and now Integrity wants to dump this loser Kyl on us…. Sheez!
March 20, 2007 at 2:48 am #731226Anonymous
Inactive
March 20, 2007 at 6:36 am #731233Anonymous
Guestand a wise move that is …… to protect the very small % that isn’t able to control its need to stick their hands in the heat and keep them there longer than they should ….. so therefore all the rest of us should not be allowed the luxury of having heat.
…… but then again … that’s not what its really about anyway is it? its that nasty thing about not being able to find a way to tax those that use the fire to heat their homes.
$$$
March 20, 2007 at 7:35 am #731237Anonymous
InactiveI’m placing a bet that Barney Frank will kick his ass. LOL
March 20, 2007 at 8:29 am #731238Anonymous
InactiveThis all seems like excellent news and definitely a step in the right direction, in my opinion it is the only way forward and the US can not keep this silly law for much longer.
March 20, 2007 at 2:54 pm #731276Anonymous
InactiveIf the rule of this court holds… and therefore online gambling is NOT illegal… doesn’t that make the Port Security legislation moot for things like Poker and Casino’s?
-
AuthorPosts