Get exclusive CAP network offers from top brands

View CAP Offers

Testing Casinos

[bsa_pro_ad_space id=2]
  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 8 posts - 46 through 53 (of 53 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #652284
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Professor asked you guys to stop throwing rocks.

    I’m not a moderator here, but I am going to express my opinion on this thread:

    Arkyt and Integrity have both made their positions very clear, and this is rapidly escalating into an argument or a feud.

    So maybe we should all switch to decaf and shut this thread down. And maybe start a new thread with the testing results.

    #652285
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Originally posted by Fergie
    Actually, I believe this post was what actually fractured the ranks here. [/quote]

    Someone is very bright at the ver least observative :)

    That comment by a fellow APCW colleague totally dissed my thought out post – and quite frankly IMO it was without merit as JTodds post adding nothing to my original post. I took it as a form of favoritism or standing up for “your boy” so-to-speak.

    Quote:
    This Point: …is being entirely ignored by everybody except for those of us involved in private testing.

    Quite possibly no one else is interested in seeing the dirt cleaned up. Hell if you were making really good money with a program why would you want to see change? If you were receiving payment from a program why would you bash them for bad behavior?

    As I stated I am not going to argue anymore – I might as well be happy with being content.

    #652286
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Originally posted by arkyt
    I’ve attempted to speak my opinion in a professional manner and all you want to do is belittle my efforts in an attempt to make your system look like gold – real professional – NOT!

    That’s possibly the most ignorant comment in this thread.

    You are anything but professional… you are opinionated and self-involved… the very things you accuse others of being.

    Originally posted by arkyt
    If you felt you needed to defend your efforts – then do so – but don’t make negative comments directed at me as a person!

    The second most ignorant statement… because until you chose to attack, ridicule, and pick-apart APCW (which, since you’re not a member and have not experience with is — once again — ignorant) I recall absolutely no comments directed at you personally.

    You were just ready for a fight.

    Originally posted by arkyt
    I’ve provided you with the perfect platform to explain to others why APCW is the right answer – you’ve done nothing but make snide comments and in the process make yourself look like a real lame guy.

    Yea… I’m the one getting personal.

    Get your Narcasistic nose out of the mirror and look at the 70 plus webmasters in APCW so far… including Fergie, Randy, Dom, and Krystal just in this thread.

    It’s you who sees no value in it…
    It’s you who is unbudging and full of pride…
    But hey, if it makes you feel better to think I look lame, fine.

    It’s exactly this attitude of yours that will lead to failure… as I’ve tried to say ‘tongue-in-cheek’ throughout this thread.

    Originally posted by arkyt
    If you desire to be a smart ass and make sarcastic statements – fine! However, I stated from the start I have no desire to argue all I am interested in is results.

    Let’s be more specific: You’re interested in your results, not any one elses. Any organization will fail with your self-absorbed, all-or-nothing, my-way-or-the-highway attitude. You’ve been this way since I’ve “known” you, and are still surprised that some find you abrasive.

    Originally posted by arkyt
    That comment by a fellow APCW colleague totally dissed my thought…

    Wha??? Ok… word-up homey… if that’s what got this party started address her. Screwed up your priorities again…eh?

    You turn people off, and that’s hard to respect. Maybe you’d rather just be feared? LOL!

    =============================================

    To everyone else…

    I am truly sorry. I tried to have a conversation… then had to defend… then had to debate… and it turned into this.

    #652287
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    :clapper:

    Quote:
    as I’ve tried to say ‘tongue-in-cheek’ throughout this thread.

    That is exactly right! You came in here tounge in cheek the second someone other than your prized APCW attempted to do some testing.

    I made directed post that were meant to encourage debate in hopes that an interest to make the system better could be developed.

    You felt threatened as you do now – so you resort to attacking and sarcasm. Why CANT people who claim to be professional take criticism without getting overly defensive!

    Testing is useless without recourse!

    So get personal – I have very thick skin – it doesnt bother me.

    #652290
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Originally posted by arkyt
    … You came in here tounge in cheek the second someone other than your prized APCW attempted to do some testing.

    Someone sounds bitter.

    If you actually believe that I feel that way, or have in any way attempted to build APCW up as the “be-all-end-all” of webmaster associations, then you’re a fool.

    Originally posted by arkyt
    I made directed post that were meant to encourage debate … You felt threatened as you do now – so you resort to attacking and sarcasm.

    Are your shoes even on the right feet?

    My first post was nothing but a reply to BB1 about additional ways to protect annonymity, APCW experience, and an offer to help. That’s when you decided to be a jackass, because it was you who was threatened. Typical ploy to throw out accusations that precisely reflect your own thought & actions.

    My second post was about the GPWA mistakes and not repeating them and another offer of help. Again, you thought I was trying to steal your oh-so novel idea.

    My third post was addressing Fergie and GPWA history…

    My fourth post was totally addressed to Dom…

    My fifth post just asked “why?” you duplicated your post… which lead to…

    My sixth post which told you clearly no one was ” dissin’ ” you…

    From there, you have been on the war path.

    Go debate yourself. This is like playing chess with a chimp.

    #652291
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Originally posted by Randy
    Arkyt and Integrity have both made their positions very clear, and this is rapidly escalating into an argument or a feud.

    I have no desire to feud – I didnt make my post to start a fight! Quite possibly that was the intent – to come in and do what ever it took to sabotage others efforts.

    When I challenged his system – he got aggressively defensive.

    People need to be able to take criticism just as easily as they take praise.

    But I agree with you Randy – there really is no reason to continue this thread. ;)

    Have a great day J Todd – best of luck – you make a great asshole :)

    #652292
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Originally posted by arkyt
    People need to be able to take criticism just as easily as they take praise.

    Doctor heal thyself.

    Randy … noted comments…

    Originally posted by arkyt
    …J Todd… you make a great asshole :)

    Ah… the asshole authority speaketh…

    ===========================

    Thanks to the rest of you for your patience.
    We now return to regular programming….

    #652303
    vladcizsol
    Member

    Ok Gang… I go out shopping and see what happens. Everyone calm down and let’s give this a breather.

    Arkyt please continue testing and lets start a new unpoluted thread where everyone can discuss results and beat up any programs that appear to be lathering up affiliates with Shaving Cream.

    I am going to close this thread and make myself a bourbon and coke.

Viewing 8 posts - 46 through 53 (of 53 total)