- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 9, 2006 at 2:26 pm #691696
Anonymous
InactiveParty Poker.
May 9, 2006 at 2:29 pm #691699Anonymous
InactivePacific Poker for all the scraping etc etc etc
May 9, 2006 at 2:32 pm #691702
vladcizsolMemberPacific Poker is a good choice!
May 9, 2006 at 7:53 pm #691730
vladcizsolMemberHow do these look?
http://www.pokeraffiliateprograms.com/poker-affiliate-warnings.html
If you guys have any more please let me know and provide history. PAP will be going live on Friday and I want to make sure have our rogue ducks in a row by then. :1Dopey:
May 9, 2006 at 8:07 pm #691733Anonymous
InactiveThats the two I just kicked off my site too.
May 9, 2006 at 8:10 pm #691734
vladcizsolMemberYep, they are verified stinkers.
Any more bad chips?
May 9, 2006 at 8:13 pm #691736Anonymous
InactiveNice looking site.
I noticed that you added pacific poker to your warnings list, where you stated that you strongly advise they not be promoted. I then noticed that you still seem to be referring affiliates to their program in addition to listing them as a certified program.
May 9, 2006 at 8:32 pm #691737
vladcizsolMemberGood catch Axl. I am glad you noticed that :wow: .
My brain dead programmers transfered an old list and included suspended programs.:slapface:
Please point out any other bone headed things like that so I can get em cleaned up before we go live.
I deep sixed Pacific
May 9, 2006 at 9:19 pm #691740Anonymous
InactiveI have been following this thread at great length and I think it is hard for us to list Party Poker, Paradise Poker and Pacific Poker as rogue poker programs as all of these rooms are among the biggest rooms on the web and have a loyal following of players. If they are rogue they would not have such a following.
This post should be rephrased to say rogue poker affiliate programs as in essense this is what you are referring to, and not the quality of the poker room itself.
May 9, 2006 at 9:28 pm #691741
vladcizsolMemberGood Point Simon…
Done..
May 9, 2006 at 9:31 pm #691742Anonymous
InactiveWorld Poker Exchange
May 9, 2006 at 9:36 pm #691743Anonymous
InactiveLooks good to me, I am affraid I have nothing to offer. But I really like the approach and the site. greek39
May 9, 2006 at 9:41 pm #691744
vladcizsolMemberQuote:World Poker ExchangeHistory? Background of outstanding issues? I have never worked with this one so I am drawing a black. They have an affiliate program? What software platform?
May 9, 2006 at 10:14 pm #691750Anonymous
InactiveI agree with Simon, two of my friends that play poker only play at Pacific and Paradise, while i prefer Poker Stars…from a players point of view they are great, from an affiliates point of view they are crap, but i can’t just not list them at all on my poker site, they are too big, although i support your stand, so i will probably end up ranking them lower than i normally would…something like meeting in the middle i guess
As for Rogue rooms
World Poker Exchange – definitely
True Poker
The “ACR” rooms, there’s about 20 of them, they like to dissapear, close your account, then reappear…a good way of ensuring your player is not yours for life.There’s a lot, most you’ve never even heard of that don’t deserve any publicity at all, good or bad
I’m just doing a poker site and have a total of about 200 poker rooms, even the crap ones
The Sportingbet 100+ group of sportsbooks now use Paradise Poker, you can list all those
Who said Party Poker, that is funny, i happen to agree
Check n Raise is a shaky operation
Any place that closes up shop, then reappears is a Rogue in my opinion…it’s like being asleep when its time to pay the bills but being wide awake when the paycheck arrives
Betonusa, although certified here, is still under investigation for confiscating poker players winnings
May 9, 2006 at 10:27 pm #691751Anonymous
InactiveParty Poker and Paradise Poker.
-
AuthorPosts