- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
That’s it exactly Dom.
I’m picking the guy who may or may not run me out of business instead of the guy who’s already trying.
Well, I would anyway since I can ‘t stand Bush
Originally posted by emg35
Now as far as there are no conspiracy theories you might want to read the free for all section on this very forum. One example Bush and Kerry belonging to the same secret society.emg35
I, for one, have never ascribed to any conspiracy theory.
Another thing: Bush is a self-proclaimed christian. A religious man who believes in god and the bible.
What part of “Thou shalt not kill” doesn’t he get?
I hate it when so-called religious people – including the people who flew planes into the WTC and George W. Bush – erroneously use religion as a reason to kill.
I understand that you all must “Hate” Bush but your reasons are unfair. You think that on top of all the crap he was to put up with, he has time to remotely worry about online gambling. He is forced to deal with issues in many places around the world while protecting us from our enemies that want to destroy everything we have in Amercian.
Yeah, online gambling will probably be put out competely by our goverment, but putting Kerry in office will NOT change anything. I don’t care what you think will happen, he will not turn back the clocks. The laws have been set and will not change. Please don’t focus this as your central reason for voting.
Rest assured that I have an entire list of reasons to vote for Kerry and not for Bush that have absolutely nothing to do with online gambling.
Originally posted by jackpotcasinogu
I understand that you all must “Hate” Bush but your reasons are unfair. You think that on top of all the crap he was to put up with, he has time to remotely worry about online gambling. He is forced to deal with issues in many places around the world while protecting us from our enemies that want to destroy everything we have in Amercian.Yeah, online gambling will probably be put out competely by our goverment, but putting Kerry in office will NOT change anything. I don’t care what you think will happen, he will not turn back the clocks. The laws have been set and will not change. Please don’t focus this as your central reason for voting.
Since we now are discussing politics in this thread, maybe we should start a new thread to discuss religion?
Quote:
I have personal friends risking their lives in Iraq, and they no longer know why they are there – where’s the smoking gun? It is about oil and nothing more.
lol … actually they are there for the oil, the fat rebuilding
contracts, extension of the war to make more money the longer it
lasts and what the New World Order calls ” The Printer ” …
in time the process will be repeated again with other countries
under even more fictitious reasons … look at history … nothing
has changed.
:rolleyes:
Originally posted by jackpotcasinogu
I understand that you all must “Hate” Bush but your reasons are unfair. You think that on top of all the crap he was to put up with, he has time to remotely worry about online gambling. He is forced to deal with issues in many places around the world while protecting us from our enemies that want to destroy everything we have in Amercian.Yeah, online gambling will probably be put out competely by our goverment, but putting Kerry in office will NOT change anything. I don’t care what you think will happen, he will not turn back the clocks. The laws have been set and will not change. Please don’t focus this as your central reason for voting.
Oh, I get it now! Ha Ha you had me fooled. I actually thought you were serious!!
No us president is perfect, most of them are flawed. But Bush is beyond flawed, he used 9/11 to further his own agenda. Yes the war on afghanistan was justified, and the result is that women are now free from Taliban slavery. But the war on Iraq? If bush really did this to make the world a better place, there are other places that need and WANT usa help such as Africa.
If he spent a tenth of what was spent on Iraq on a real cause no children would be dying of thirst this summer. He’s in Iraq for the oil and that’s the only reason. How he can sit there and fake to mourn those that die is beyond me.
I rather a president who is unsure and hesitates until all of the information is in before declaring war. After Iraq is over if it’s ever over, do you think it’ll stop there? No, he’ll wage war on a different nation. Lockheed Martin is going to want to manufacture more weapons and for that to happen they need a war.
Every international community loved or was satisfied with thier relationship with the USA until Bush took office. He’s alienated Russia, Canada, & most European nations. I wont even start with his track record on the environment…
Kerry sucks. Hell as far as I’m concerned it’s not much of a democracy if there’s only 2 real groups to choose from who both have special interest in mind. But looking at previous track records the Democrats have been a little bit better at peace, and not stripping away all of our freedoms.
Antoine
What Antoine said.
ditto
Some guy posted this recently. He bought a high-end compuer sleeve that had this manufacturers tag in it.
Anyone from Montreal care to translate?That’s hilarious, for anyone who needs a translation it reads:
we are sorry our president is an idiot
we did not vote for him.LOL the bottom part says
” We are sorry that your President is an idiot “
” We did not vote for him “
Here’s the manufacturer:
http://tombihn.com/Many American still hold misperceptions about Iraq war, poll finds
By Frank Davies
Knight Ridder Newspapers
WASHINGTON – A new poll shows that 57 percent of Americans continue to believe that Saddam Hussein gave “substantial support” to al-Qaida terrorists before the war with Iraq, despite a lack of evidence of that relationship.
In addition, 45 percent of Americans have the impression that “clear evidence” was found that Iraq worked closely with Osama bin Laden’s network, and a majority believe that before the war Iraq either had weapons of mass destruction (38 percent) or a major program for developing them (22 percent).
There’s no known evidence to date that these statements are true.
U.S. weapons inspector David Kay testified before Congress in January that no weapons were found and prewar intelligence on Iraq was “almost all wrong.” CIA Director George Tenet last month rejected assertions by Vice President Dick Cheney that Iraq had cooperated with al-Qaida.
Despite that record, many Americans continue to believe that the threat from Iraqi weapons and its alleged links to terrorism justified the war. That conviction correlates closely with support for the war and President Bush, the poll released Thursday found.
For example, among those who say most experts agree that Iraq had banned weapons, 72 percent plan to vote for Bush.
The poll for the University of Maryland’s Program in International Policy Attitudes, conducted by Knowledge Networks from March 16 to 22, surveyed 1,311 adults and had a margin of error of 2.8 percentage points.
Claims by the Bush administration about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and links to terrorism helped shape public perceptions, said Steven Kull, the director of the program. No cause-and-effect relationship between the beliefs and support for the president could be proved, however.
In the poll, roughly 4 in 10 Americans perceived the administration as saying it had clear evidence that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction just before the war.
The administration has backed off earlier claims that evidence of such weapons was found, but the president continues to say the weapons question is open. “We all thought he had weapons,” Bush said Wednesday.
“We’re so polarized right now that people are seeing what they want to see through a very partisan lens,” said Thomas Mann, a political analyst and Brookings Institution scholar.
The PIPA poll did have several warning signs for the administration, as respondents have become more pessimistic about the prospects for success in Iraq.
The number of those who believed the year-old war would result in greater peace and stability in the Middle East has dropped from 56 percent in a Gallup poll in May 2003 to 40 percent last month in the PIPA poll.
And for the first time, a majority of Americans – 51 percent – said they thought that a majority of Iraqis wanted U.S. forces to leave. The survey was completed before the worst violence of the occupation erupted in April.
—
Complete results can be found at the Web site of the Program on International Policy Attitudes, at http://www.pipa.org.
