- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
well, I think you have to figure that if a casino is going to offer you $350 for CPA they are sure banking on enough players going way over that $1000 buck amount in order for them to make it worth while to give you $350.
I know for me when I gamble I’m way over that amount. Ya’ll would love me. I’d be a whale.
(not the smartest of them, but I’d easily make you wish you went % rather than CPA)
Ben
PS. Here’s a question….If you sign in up at a casino under your own affiliation we’ll they give ya money back….? My guess is probably not, but if so it would be a nice way to discount one’s own gambling……
Benito777 wrote:PS. Here’s a question….If you sign in up at a casino under your own affiliation we’ll they give ya money back….? My guess is probably not, but if so it would be a nice way to discount one’s own gambling……I wouldn’t recommend it unless you went through their Terms & Conditions with a fine tooth comb, and then it you couldn’t find anything I would still ask your affiliate manager.
Bet22 wrote:Is Your Average Player Lifetime Value Over $350 in comissions for you?
Professor wrote a good summary. It depends on your traffic, the affiliate program conditions, and the casino. My average player value is far under $350, not even in the ballpark. For me, a CPA program is usually the better choice.good points all around. I think your right too Lori in Making sure I really scoured the T&C. I think I’d stay away from it as I think more about it.
Boy rakebacks seem like they could certainly make things pretty competitive.
Still I guess not much different than what casinos do anyway with player cards in brick & motor places. Still that much more effort to keep happy loyal players…..guess that’s par for the course though in business though.Ben
NolanA wrote:Professor wrote a good summary.Could the Professor kindly give the link to that thread. I’ve been considering CPA on some accounts and would find it interesting to read but too damn lazy to look for it.:kissass:
Nevermind, didn’t have to look to far to find it. Now that’s being really lazy.
