- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 7, 2005 at 12:05 am #677984
Anonymous
InactiveI believe it would most often be 50*$300 = $15,000, but you’d want to read the fine print to be sure.
December 7, 2005 at 12:06 am #677985Anonymous
Inactiveoh ok thanks
December 8, 2005 at 1:38 am #678079Anonymous
InactiveThat really depends on the program. As the other poster wrote, you really have to read the T&C because it makes a steep difference.. some programs start at 75$ and end at 300$, such as Pokerstars. You can imagine the difference between 20×75+20×100 and 40×100.
December 8, 2005 at 11:10 am #678102Anonymous
Inactiveworldpeace wrote:Let’s just say1-20 $200
21-40 $250
41+ $300This is the payout structure. If I sign up 50 players, do I get (50×300) $15000? or (20×200 + 20×250 + 10×300) $12000?
:santa2:
no.
:notify:Unless your players are extremely profitable for the casino (ie lose more money than the casino is going to pay you out).
Otherwise they’ll blame you for not bringing big losing players – cancel your account – without paying anything.
That’s assumeing that you’re talking about 888.com.
:banger:December 8, 2005 at 11:24 am #678103Anonymous
Inactivelol….i will go with REV. SHARE….
CPA is like unprotected sex…….
:woohoo:
December 8, 2005 at 12:37 pm #678109
vladcizsolMemberWhile there is some value for CPA when it comes to Poker or Bingo for Casinos CPA = :bullshit:
December 8, 2005 at 1:57 pm #678114Anonymous
InactiveWhile there is some value for CPA when it comes to Poker or Bingo for Casinos CPA =
I think even Poker CPA is insane unless you have players that just play rarely at very small limits. I’ve yet to see a CPA deal worthwhile in poker, would have to be $300+ in most cases to even touch rev. share on rake.
December 14, 2005 at 12:20 am #678512Anonymous
Inactiveso Rev Share is better than CPA?
most players wont bring you $200 in comission over their lifetime in a casino
December 14, 2005 at 12:24 am #678514Anonymous
InactiveThat’s a real load of crap… Sorry for the harsh reply.
Even IF, by some chance most of your players earn you less than $200 – What about those players that earn you over $1k / month???
I have some players that I earn quite a bit more than that off of. If I were CPA I would have shot myself in the foot.
Besides, most of the Casino properties will shut you down if you give them players that they ‘lose’ on. i.e, if you bring a player that spends $100 in the casino and never returns… You earn $200 CPA.
Now the Casino loses money. They send you a letter that says your players are fraudulent and will not pay for any of them.
It’s very common… read up.
December 14, 2005 at 12:26 am #678515Anonymous
InactiveRevenue share is significantly more profitable. Many experienced webmasters on this forum will say the same thing.
December 14, 2005 at 5:23 am #678544Anonymous
Inactivedo you guys have players that deposit more than $1000 a month?
December 14, 2005 at 1:51 pm #678569Anonymous
InactiveI got a new player at All Jackpots last month. I made $3,000 off this player last month and already over $2,000 this month. I don’t get a lot of players, but I do get some real nice ones. If I went CPA, I would be broke.
December 14, 2005 at 1:57 pm #678572Anonymous
Inactivehow much did he deposit for you to make $3000??
December 14, 2005 at 2:06 pm #678573Anonymous
InactiveI don’t know how much he/she deposited, but Brightshare pays 25%. So this player lost over $12,000 last month alone.
December 14, 2005 at 2:55 pm #678580Anonymous
InactiveBet22 wrote:do you guys have players that deposit more than $1000 a month?Yes, absolutely! :colgate: -
AuthorPosts
