- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
I agree with Dominique that a transcript of the chat doesn’t need to be posted. I think Lou’s planning to make an official statement regarding the outcome of the meeting as soon as he can get back online.
Don’t worry, one of the things we did decide is to post about the meeting and thus start a thread that will show all the programs where we stand.
All the people who couldn’t make it can then lend their voice to our concerns and we will make a unified statement.
Point taken Dominique. I just copied it so I could review if I missed anything. I won’t be distributing it for the very reasons you mentioned.
Perhaps it is a good idea though to announce that the meeting is “for the record” next time, and to go “off the record” when we like. Then we can post the items that were for the record.
A summary is fine with me. I would have liked to attended but could not.
Hey, make sure you guys bring me in, on the good stuff. I be here :cheers:
:cheers: :cheers: :cheers:Dominique wrote:Perhaps it is a good idea though to announce that the meeting is “for the record” next time, and to go “off the record” when we like. Then we can post the items that were for the record.Something like that would be good as 1:00pm EST is 3:00am in my part of the woods. The trade off being if I want the juicy stuff I might need to stay up, otherwise I just have to accept the on the record stuff.
Just a summary please, if atall.
I’ve been checking the forum for a copy of the results of the live chat. Have I missed it? I can’t find it mentioned anywhere.
Sue
How many and which aff programs/affiliates came?
I would have came but the time difference didn’t suit my schedule.
The professor will post something about it – however, it seesm that because of some inclement weather he has not had internet access.
We should hear from him soon. We resolved to start a thread for all to participate in.
Any news Prof?
Cheers
Simmo!
Hi Guys
I will make a full post later today or tomorrow. My internet access was down from Friday until Tuesday night and I ended up buried in projects I had to dig myself back out of.A brief review was the chat was well attended with 22 members taking part. Several of the casinos were present but silently digesting the conversation.
The general consensus was we are not thrilled with several of the changes to terms and conditions proposed by a number of our casino partners.The main objections lie with retroactively changing terms and conditions previously agreed upon and the bundling of all casinos with respect to commissions due for a calender month.
I believe there are sound business reasons why these changes are not desirable for either the casinos or us as affiliates and I will be presenting that position in my follow up post.
Sorry for the delay…
