- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
Look Dom. I am not so happy about your last post. I find it uneasing when I agree completely.
& I don’t make any money worth talking about from affiliatism, but I have got rather sick of 888’s “attitude” towards people who take my waffle and make money from it, without even asking or a courtesy linking, let alone bunging me a few quid.
The blackhatters don’t claim to be holier than though right. They don’t bother me.
Dominique wrote:If I didn’t believe that we can get this cleaned up in a businesslike manner, I would pull the 888 page and go on my merry way.This is about the only thing I would disagree with. I dont think we created blacklist pages to clean up 888’s mess, we created them to draw attention to it and only did so after they refused to clean it up. And if they were still refusing to work with us, I doubt anyone would be quick to take their pages down.
If they truly wish to change their ways and erase the last few months they are going to have to do much better than issuing threats. Hopefully they will come back to the table next week and show some sincerity while doing so. As joeyl has said they need to come to the table with a different attitude for sure.
I have been working on this since Friday and still going like the energizer bunny. I will be turning up the temperature. In the meantime based on Google’s policies as I previously outlined, what up with this?
http://www.888snooker.com
http://www.888snookerworldchampionship.com
http://www.888worldchampionshipsnooker.com
http://www.888worldsnooker.com
http://www.bjchamp.net
http://www.blackjack247.com
http://www.casino-net-casino.net
http://www.casino-net-casino.org
http://www.casino-on-net.info
http://www.casino-on-net.ws
http://www.casino777.com
http://www.casinocasinonet.net
http://www.casinoon.net
http://www.casinoonmac.com
http://www.casinos-on-net.org
wwwww.casinoonnet.com
w.craps247.com
http://www.eighteighteight.com
http://www.excitecasino.net
http://www.gambler-casino.net
http://www.javacasino.net
http://www.kasino-on-net.com
http://www.kasinoonnet.com
http://www.monaco-77.com
http://www.monaco777.com
http://www.slots247.com
http://www.tend-to-gamble.com
http://www.timetolotto.com
http://www.wagerguide.com
http://www.888-poker.com
http://www.888-poker.net
http://www.888poker.net
http://www.coronacasino.net
http://www.harry-poker.com
http://www.harry-poker.net
http://www.harrypoker.com
http://www.harrypoker.net
http://www.harypoker.com
http://www.harypoker.net
http://www.online-poker-888.com
http://www.pacficpoker.com
http://www.pacficpoker.net
http://www.pacific-poker.com
http://www.pacific-poker.net
http://www.pacificopoker.com
http://www.pacificpoker.com
http://www.pacificpoker.net
http://www.pacifikpoker.com
http://www.pacifiquepoker.com
http://www.pasificpoker.com
http://www.pasifikpoker.com
http://www.pokehouse.com
http://www.poker-888.net
http://www.poker-city.com
http://www.poker-on-net.net
http://www.poker-on.com
http://www.poker-on.net
http://www.poker-pacific.com
http://www.poker-pacific.net
http://www.pokerhause.com
http://www.pokerhawse.com
http://www.pokerhoose.com
http://www.pokerhorse.com
http://www.pokerhose.com
http://www.pokerhous.com
http://www.pokerhows.com
http://www.pokerhuos.com
http://www.pokerhuose.com
http://www.pokerhuse.com
http://www.pokernnet.com
http://www.pokernnet.net
http://www.pokeron.com
http://www.pokeronet.com
http://www.pokeronet.net
http://www.pokeronnet.net
http://www.pokeronnet.org
http://www.pokeronnnet.com
http://www.pokeronnnet.net
http://www.pokeroonnet.com
http://www.pokeroonnet.net
http://www.pokerouse.com
http://www.pokerpacific.com
http://www.pokerpoint.com
http://www.reef-club-poker.com
http://www.reef-club-poker.net
http://www.reefclubpoker.com
http://www.reefclubpoker.net
http://www.refclubpoker.com
http://www.refclubpoker.net
http://www.texholdem.comThere are thousands more but I am trying to limit these to on page. Feel free to check out the whois. I don’t rely on the whois normally but in this instance its’ workable. greek39^*
greek39^*
axl wrote:I dont think we created blacklist pages to clean up 888’s mess, we created them to draw attention to it.Perhaps many had different motives.
To me it is simply a tool to expedite the final goal – cleanup.
It is very similair to what 888 itself is doing – saturating the engines with a message. Just that we do it legally and completely white hat.
Dominique wrote:It is very similair to what 888 itself is doing – saturating the engines with a message. Just that we do it legally and completely white hat.An excellent analogy, dom :clapper:
WTG greek39, you have been busy. Remind me not to get into your bad books.
Cheers
A blackhat aff code:
All the sites mentioned above plus more will be submitted to Google as a violaton of their spam guidelines. I will be remainning on topic which is spamindexing.
Contrary to popular believe, Google does not want to lose this industry it is important asset to their revenue stream and to neophites. What they do want is malicious scripting blasting through their filters via BH tatics to stop. It is not about us saving our industry, its’ about 888 saving theirs.
Tame the beast you have created 888 if at all possible. My spam results are going to Google. They have been wanting to hear from me for quite sometime. Google has managed to clean up other programs but your stays intake, this will stop.
Afterwards I plan on focusing on ecogra. greek3
greek,
of course all these 888 domains are spamming the index,
wich is not good
but its not hard evidence of blackhat in my opinioni mean, you cannot forbid them to have multiple domains
or am i mistaken and overlooking things?
are those scraped pages wich redirect?
elgoog I have not discussed black hat strageties as of yet, but will be. Today’s topic will be ecogra as their views on adware, malware, and scumware. I will try and have this down in a few hours. greek39
The page you are clicking on is not what you see. You click and you are immediately taken to a 888 property.
Google says:
Don’t employ cloaking or sneaky redirects.
Avoid “doorway” pages created just for search engines, or other “cookie cutter” approaches such as affiliate programs with little or no original content.
greek39 wrote:elgoog I have not discussed black hat strageties as of yet, but will be. Today’s topic will be ecogra as their views on adware, malware, and scumware. I will try and have this down in a few hours. greek39If you would like to discuss eCOGRA, please do so in a new thread.
This thread is for 888 and to facilitate communication with them and about trying to clean up search results.
On the contrary, the letter sent by Nicholas did mention ecogra. Therfore it should be dicussed here as it pertains to the letter sent. greek39
Nicolas is not moderator here, I am.
He can write a letter including the sex life of elephants and the secret life of plants and I will still want to keep one subject per thread.
If you want to write about eCOGRA, you are more than welcome to do so in a seperate thread.
This thread is to bring a solution to the standoff with 888 over blackhat methods in the search engines. It is to encourage them to come here and talk to us. It is all about 888 and blackhat practices.
eCGRA and spyware is a different topic and as such gets a different thread.
