- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
This rule of Wagershare.com is well over a year old, has affected me and is in my opinion completely fair.
Most companies will remove the no negative carryover rule completely because they lose too much money on it.The point is:
As long as your highroller loses, you win, but if he wins you lose. Cant expect to earn 15k on a guy that won big the month before just because he lost it the month after. +15k – 15k = 0
And a fair point to mention, you still earn income from all the other players irrelevant of that highroller so they still take a risk.Wagershare is a solid company, one of my preferred and have always treated my account fairly. Cant speak for others but I will trust this company a hell of a lot more than most of the recommended programs at cap.
I am aware of Wagershare’s high roller policy. I’ve been hit with it a few times, but I’m always aware of it. I might not like it but I do know about it before I decide to promote them. As most casinos do not carry over any kind of negative balance, it might be worth looking at promoting an alternative brand.
I’ve seen that ‘high roller’ adjustment clause at some other casino site and wondered what it was and how it worked.
Good to know in advance how it works, otherwise I’d be plenty sad when it was applied to me.
@casinosurfer 233415 wrote:
We do not have negative carry over for anything less than $10,000.
Curious how much did they carry over? Did they carry over the amount more than 10k or did they carry it all?
I think it’s ok as long as they fence the player and don’t let this affect the income you get from your other players.
@FictionNet 236533 wrote:
I am aware of Wagershare’s high roller policy. I’ve been hit with it a few times, but I’m always aware of it. I might not like it but I do know about it before I decide to promote them. As most casinos do not carry over any kind of negative balance, it might be worth looking at promoting an alternative brand.
I am coming off as very pro wagershare now I know.
But, instead of wagershare removing all no negative carryover, don´t you think this is a good and logical solution?
Player wins $200 000 k one month then the next month loses the $200k. You are on 40% and thus earn $80 000. The player won his fortune on the 28th and lost it on the 3rd. Is it fair to take $80k from wagershare or any other company for that matter when they earned nothing on said player?
To me, while, being able to earn said 80k would be amazing and I would love a program for it, it´s not that fair and illogical. I am amazed some companies still use no negative carryover for high revshare deals.
And the player does not get banned, simply stated. When he loses more than he has won you will earn revshare on it and it does not spread to any other wagershare casino or player.
