- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 9, 2005 at 11:27 pm #670533
Anonymous
InactiveRental car is out. It will cost more to park than worth while. Taxi or walk if it’s short. I was in the Venetian and it was very nice, but I didn’t stay there.
August 9, 2005 at 11:59 pm #670536Anonymous
InactiveOf the two, I’ve stayed at Venetian several times, but only visited the casino at Wynn. From what I’ve seen, I would prefer the Venetian. However, Wynn is closer to the conference at the Stardust. (The Venetian is next door to Wynn in the other direction, with a construction area in between.) Both are walking distance to the conference at the Stardust.
They’re both very nice, so you can’t go wrong.
As pokermonger says, don’t bother with a rental car.August 10, 2005 at 12:17 am #670538
vladcizsolMemberYep, dont bother renting a car it will end up costing you a fortune in Valet fees and you probably wont even use it.
Of the two hotels you mentioned I would go for the Venetian BUT there are more attendees staying at the Wynn so its a toss up.
August 10, 2005 at 1:04 am #670540Anonymous
InactiveDon’t ask me why, but I had a feeling the Venetian would be the better selection :tounge2: However, as I’ve indicated I had already confirmed one … which of course is the Wynn :crazy:
So now I’m kicking myself in the butt :banger:Just kidding, I’m getting from your replies that there is no HUGE difference so thanks again for the info. I will definitely not rent a car and I’m looking forward to this conference.
August 10, 2005 at 8:33 am #670551Anonymous
InactiveA lot of people are staying at the Wynn, so you will be in good company

Pity I am not going to make it this year. :unhappy:
-
AuthorPosts