- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
There would obviously be zero risk of scam because the escrow company would be in charge of all payments. And the escrow account would be owned by all 100 partners so no one person would be able make any changes to the account.
Sounds like an interesting idea to me.
I like the idea…but the legality of owning an online casino is a little sketchy.
Sounds great!
this is the problem: not every webmaster would be able to advertise the poker skin the same amount. So, for the people that would not be able to advertise that much, it would be great because they still get 1/100th of the money made, eventhough they referred less players than everyone else.
That could easily be split evenly – players could be tracked – and the partners all get a share of the profits after expenses, which would include ‘affiliate’ commissions.
Forgive me if this is a dumb statement as I am not very familiar with a poker skin. I did a little reading on it at pokerblasters and my first inclination is why on earth would anyone spend $5k to get 25-30% of the rake when we get that for free now just by being an affiliate. I am sure I dont understand this.
bonusgeek brings up a great point…Is there something missing that we aren’t seeing that would make this worth it? the % is the same as being an affiliate…
This is what I’m wondering myself now actually. This is a valid issue, but my assumption (and I never should have assumed this to begin with) was that if you have a poker skin all other affilates who sign up to be an affiliate for your website would generate revenue for your brand. There is nothing on the pokerblasters site that states this though. I found out about pokerblasters through this thread so I’m now asking if anyone has more knowledge on how this works their input would be greatly appreciated.
