- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
@pdjoe 129374 wrote:
There is no doubt in my mind that many of the RTG stats are off. In this case they seem to go in my favor…..lol.
Summary for this Pay Period Number of Clickthroughs: 47
Number of Downloaders: 34
Number of Players: 90
Number of New Depositors: 0
Total Initial Deposits: $0.00
Total Deposits: $0.00
Net Win: $21,989.62
Coupon Amounts Awarded: $3,198.00
Manager Credit Amounts Awarded: $0.00
ChargeBacks: $0.00
Net Profit: (Net Win – Coupons – Credits – Chargebacks) $18,791.06
Amount Deducted: $0.00
Amount Miscellaneous Adjustments: $0.00
Amount Added For Reversed Bans: $0.00
Amount Earned: $6,576.87
Amount Earned From Tiers: $0.00
Balance Due This Period: $6,562.28What do you think the chance of collecting are for me? LOL
None
Might have been someone who deposited or won the previous month and lost it this month /. But im sure the manager is going to give out some credits in the next 2 days
@the27offsuit 129375 wrote:
None
Might have been someone who deposited or won the previous month and lost it this month /. But im sure the manager is going to give out some credits in the next 2 days
Those were my first thoughts to so i checked the previous month and found no signs of any deposits. I’ll also agree that I won’t be collecting that money anytime in the near future.
Certainly the preofessors example shows poor business practice – how you can award 191% credits – with the bulk being at the managers decision is beyond me.
:Cry:In this case it does seem likely that manager credits are being used to defraud the affiliate. And that reflects the variable quality of RTG owners.
But – when used correctly – you can’t expect to be paid out for the “funny money” either. It must come off the gross win.
Although the most accurate calculation would actually be to not subtract any credits that are still sitting in players account – this would get around the shonky manager credit tactic.But I do imagine it would be a trickier piece of maths.
