- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 23, 2009 at 2:19 pm #793532
Anonymous
InactiveWell, I think we can all say that the report was flawed and should largely be ignored.
Please do make your cookies for 90 days and overwriteable by another aff cookie. I know you are new to the industry, but the current set up allows for some affiliates to gain an unfair advantage and monopolize the acquisition of Rome players. We have such cases in history.
Other than that, I don’t see a problem.
In the case of the tester with the cleared cookie plus dynamic IP – unfortunately we do lose players with this going on everywhere.
January 23, 2009 at 10:53 pm #793619Anonymous
GuestHi Dominique,
Actually given all the terrible things that were said about us, I’d prefer if the report was not ignored. In the end, it was proved that only one player was missing and for a pretty good reason. I bet you’ll find this to be the case in most tracking systems under the conditions that Peralis deposited. The report was successful and proved us to be honest and that we tracked all the deposits.
Our new system to be implemented Monday will be completely cookiless. The last affiliate that referred the player will get the credit and there is no TTL on the cookie since there won’t be one. We feel this is the ideal and most fair way to do things and we’re very thankful for being made aware of this now and not further along.
Lastly, I am far from new to the industry as I’ve been in it for over 5 years and pretty much every show
Don’t you remember me? Thanks again for helping us clear this up. I’m hoping you’ll give us another shot with your US traffic.BR,
JC.
Dominique;195186 wrote:Well, I think we can all say that the report was flawed and should largely be ignored.Please do make your cookies for 90 days and overwriteable by another aff cookie. I know you are new to the industry, but the current set up allows for some affiliates to gain an unfair advantage and monopolize the acquisition of Rome players. We have such cases in history.
Other than that, I don’t see a problem.
In the case of the tester with the cleared cookie plus dynamic IP – unfortunately we do lose players with this going on everywhere.
February 25, 2009 at 12:35 am #796026Anonymous
InactiveSorry I have not addressed this before but in behalf of the error that was made by CAP forum I have instructed my staff to please add banners back to all sites. I feel it only fair that your casino be once again marketing by my site since this error has really damaged your business. I know that the entire staff at CAP is very sorry and I know the Professor stressed that many times as well. If I can do anything else J let me know. :hattip:
Oh and it was cute that your guy wanted to go outside and have a snowball fight with me I should have went for it ..lol He is a good guy!
February 25, 2009 at 9:14 pm #796083Anonymous
GuestThanks C,
It’s nice to know that despite all the turmoil with CAP at the moment, you are still taking the time to right mistakes that were made. I have been in communication with John Dang regarding a more public retraction of their whitepaper and he has agreed to do as much. Having said that, I appreciate you taking the time to help right a wrong and to give us another chance now that you know that the audit’s results were in fact completely positive.
Prior to London, Gabe had never seen snow in those amounts before so as you can imagine, he was quite excited about it. However, he’s stated to me in private that he is extremely disappointed that you weren’t willing to participate in the snowball fight. For some reason, I have a feeling we won’t get a second chance at that in Mexico

BR,
JC.
-
AuthorPosts