- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 4, 2006 at 4:47 am #709416
Anonymous
InactiveHi ya

Well whilst it’s good (maybe) that some are already ’embracing’ the new potential situation, maybe they are being a bit quick (IMHO)
Either way, again IMHO, it’s not really the best way to go -I’m more than happy for things to be regulated properly so us webbies don’t have to deal with the (relatively very few) complaints but rather people can deal with one organisation where they will feel there opinions are treated fairly.
One day, we will get there – but it will be a long long drive to get there.
The main point I guess in this post is – is it really the right way to go – whilst it may help us affiliates in the short term – the whole idea of introducing another infinite number of payment options (we already list 35+) – is this really the way things ‘should’ be going? maybe anything is better than nothing but I can’t help feeling that doing things in a ’roundabout’ way – is maybe more morally wrong than the BS reasons for the US ‘voted into power’ that they are sending people via their miscontrued messages

Geno/CC
October 4, 2006 at 9:26 pm #709733Anonymous
InactiveThere will be ways to get money into a casino for Americans – somehow.
Waiting for the first casino to not honour an American winner under such circumstances.
Cynic? Probably….
October 4, 2006 at 9:53 pm #709747Anonymous
GuestWaiting for the first casino to not honour an American winner under such circumstances.
excellent point!
and you can bet there will be casinos who will use this (as yet another way) of avoiding payment.
actually the point I was trying to make in this thread is that there WILL be players from the states still playing so the thought that the entire 80% of the market will be gone is not as likely as what some first thought.
-
AuthorPosts