- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 19, 2007 at 12:20 am #723327
Anonymous
InactiveI am sure you will be forgiven
Our reputation is our paycheck when we write for other people, and when you give a thread a bad ‘feel’ if you will, people don’t order, John is the newest in the group of content writers here on CAP, so this ‘intro thread’ is kind of important to his future, or whether he has one writing content for other people 
As for lazy, I shiver at the people that you threw that out to, I personally do not write content for cheap, so the biggest names in the forum here are my customers, far far from lazy.. busy maybe, but I’d never call any of them lazy.
But you apologized, and that goes a long way

GL guys
January 20, 2007 at 11:29 pm #723658Anonymous
InactiveAffiliates don’t have time to write long articles or reviews that are of high quality. That’s why they pay for them. Since Lady has such a great service and affiliates and webmasters know they are getting quality, they pay her to provide this and it’ definitely worth it. A good article that is well written can take days to put together and webmasters and affiliates sometime have several sites they need content for…..hence using a service and paying for it.
January 20, 2007 at 11:37 pm #723661
gamesdexMemberI would also like to say that the reviews I provide are of an equal, if not higher standard (self promotion I know) to Lady Holdem’s. It’s nice to see some people sticking up for the need for content.
January 20, 2007 at 11:43 pm #723662Anonymous
InactiveJohn, no offense but Lady has been around a LONG LONG time and her content is excellent…..and you get what you pay for. Length means nothing if quality isn’t there.
And yes, FRESH content is essential to keep a website going.January 20, 2007 at 11:51 pm #723665
gamesdexMemberDo not get me wrong: I am not doubting the standard of Lady Holdem’s content. I am merely claiming that I can match and potentially beat it for a more affordable price. I do realise the quantity is nothing if content isn’t there.
As an example please tale a look at: http://www.poker.freebets.info/ladbrokes-poker-free-bonus.html under the Ladbrokes Poker Review section.
This is the standard of review I am providing for $25. It is approximately 900 words long of high quality content. The review normally contains a section about the new player bonus, but this is ommited from the review section on this page, because it is included at the top.
For the same price can also cater to custom titles/formats to suit a webmasters site.
January 20, 2007 at 11:55 pm #723666Anonymous
Inactivehow long have you been writing content for online gambling? How long have you been a player?
January 20, 2007 at 11:57 pm #723667
gamesdexMemberCaliGirl wrote:how long have you been writing content for online gambling? How long have you been a player?Writing content is a relatively new venture although I have been a player for a number of years. Why do you ask?
January 21, 2007 at 12:02 am #723668Anonymous
InactiveJohn,
the grammer is terrible in this article….
for ex:“It has the luxury of being able to draw many players from its bookmaker and casino businesses and with such a well respected name can attract many others also.”
“As a result, over eight thousand users can be found online at peak times despite none of the being from the US, Ladbrokes Poker having decided not to run the risk of accepting US players.”
These are NOT complete sentences and there are mistakes all over….
with commas not being there. Did you use spell check?“There is ( SHOULD BE ARE, not IS )a large number of freerolls, satellites and big money signature tournaments where you can win seats for televised tournaments.”
“It is easy to use and players can view in order to select a table the number of players waiting, the percentage of players seeing the flop, the average hands per hour (a stat which many poker rooms have removed) and the average pot size. This allows you to really single in on the game that’s suitable for you.”
HUH????
It’s bad grammer all over and bad punctuation……
This is what I’m talking about.JohnV wrote:Do not get me wrong: I am not doubting the standard of Lady Holdem’s content. I am merely claiming that I can match and potentially beat it for a more affordable price. I do realise the quantity is nothing if content isn’t there.As an example please tale a look at: http://www.poker.freebets.info/ladbrokes-poker-free-bonus.html under the Ladbrokes Poker Review section.
This is the standard of review I am providing for $25. It is approximately 900 words long of high quality content. The review normally contains a section about the new player bonus, but this is ommited from the review section on this page, because it is included at the top.
For the same price can also cater to custom titles/formats to suit a webmasters site.
January 21, 2007 at 12:08 am #723669
gamesdexMemberYeah, right. You have found one typo and a couple sentences in which you claim the grammar is wrong.
Please provide me with a better review for the money. I have many happy customers and I’m sure I will continue to have many more.
You can also view a similar review: http://www.poker.freebets.info/party-poker-free-bonus.html
January 21, 2007 at 12:10 am #723670Anonymous
Inactivesee? You’re comparing your review to the money. Yup, it’s worth about $25.
Lady’s are worth 50-75….
Grammer is a HUGE part of writing as it keeps the reader’s attention.
It’s important to have complete sentences and commas where they should be. Webmasters pay for good content, and that includes the grammer…
So yes, you can sell yours for $25 because it’s a good price….January 21, 2007 at 12:13 am #723671Anonymous
InactiveI saw some spelling and grammer errors but it was much better then the first one….although there were SEVERAL run on sentences…
and this is awful:
“It is regularly updated, with major changes to the software having being made in 2003,”
HAVING BEING???
JohnV wrote:Yeah, right. You have found one typo and a couple sentences in which you claim the grammar is wrong.Please provide me with a better review for the money. I have many happy customers and I’m sure I will continue to have many more.
You can also view a similar review: http://www.poker.freebets.info/party-poker-free-bonus.html
January 21, 2007 at 12:16 am #723672
gamesdexMemberI’m sorry (and this is no slight on Lady Holdem as she has been supportive as anyone in this thread to the need for content), but if I didn’t know any better I would expect you were the same person.
Please show me a 500 word review my Lady Holdem which is worth 50-75 dollars. I personally think my reviews are worth much more than 25 and are very good value for the price. Personally, I think your criticisms are largely unfounded, but I am not going to argue with you, because its simply not something I am interested in doing. People can make their own judgements.
January 21, 2007 at 12:18 am #723673Anonymous
InactiveLOL now I know you’re new to the forum if you think we’re one and the same….
Lady has a content site….in which she markets…
Maybe you should do some investigating before accusing…:banger:One of her sites is here:
January 21, 2007 at 12:25 am #723674
gamesdexMemberI asked for a review, not a site, and I am quite aware Lady Holdem has a website.
Nevertheless, I am shortly going to start another thread because this is just getting out of hand. Firstly, there is a discussion as to whether content should even be paid for and then whatever discussion we’re involved in now.
January 21, 2007 at 12:26 am #723675Anonymous
InactiveMy criticisms are not unfounded. It’s right there in black and white. I’m sure you’d be a great content writer if for the grammer. They’re good articles, but they need to be re-worded correctly in many areas. The info is terrific…
JohnV wrote:I’m sorry (and this is no slight on Lady Holdem as she has been supportive as anyone in this thread to the need for content), but if I didn’t know any better I would expect you were the same person.Please show me a 500 word review my Lady Holdem which is worth 50-75 dollars. I personally think my reviews are worth much more than 25 and are very good value for the price. Personally, I think your criticisms are largely unfounded, but I am not going to argue with you, because its simply not something I am interested in doing. People can make their own judgements.
-
AuthorPosts