- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 8, 2005 at 1:23 pm #665244
Anonymous
InactiveI suspect that a lot of your free players were being diverted to rake back sites.
May 8, 2005 at 2:02 pm #665248Anonymous
InactiveThis is over a period of months with Tradal/Empire. At the time I was promoting them it was not for free play or freerolls.
425 clicks, 193 DL, 69 fun accounts, 0 money. Next. :rolleyes:
I do have a freeroll page on one of my sites that gets pretty good traffic. But it is hard to know how much they eventually convert to real money because there are no stats that will tell me that. My guess is that I get some down the road but not much. I keep it up there mainly as a convenience for players trying to build bankrolls that do not have a lot of money, or the new players not wanting to risk money but still try it out.
May 9, 2005 at 5:25 pm #665297Anonymous
InactiveDominique wrote:I suspect that a lot of your free players were being diverted to rake back sites.I don’t know.. It would surprise me if a big percentage of them even knew what rake back is..
May 9, 2005 at 6:38 pm #665302Anonymous
InactiveIf they ever go to a poker forum, they do. Forums troll rooms sometimes, and some affiliates routinely troll poker rooms to find rake back candidates, then get them to sign up under them unstead of you.
May 10, 2005 at 1:09 pm #665329Anonymous
InactiveYes maybe.. But I don’t know if it is so likely they’ll start with rake back the first month they are playing..
Does anyone else have an opinion of my original question?
May 10, 2005 at 2:04 pm #665341Anonymous
Inactiveoh, I guess I never said that 7 real players out of 200 fun players is totally unacceptable.
Sorry. I just dived into looking for a reason.
May 10, 2005 at 2:31 pm #665349Anonymous
InactiveYou don’t need to be sorry I am happy for your answer
. I shouldn’t have written “anyone else”, of course I am interested if you have more to say about this Dominique.I agree, 7 out of 200 is low, but maybe it is because of the low quality of my players, they were drawn to the room with promises of freerolls after all. I have started sending them to Party instead (Using their $5000 freeroll as bate), but the success there doesn’t seem to be better although I’ll have to wait some time to be certain.
May 11, 2005 at 1:22 pm #665394Anonymous
Inactive7 Money accounts out of 200 at Empire is better than I have traditionally done there using ‘free’ as bait….. they have generally averaged in the 1/50 area for me over the course of the last year, using this type of advertising.
Party does far better in that regard for me. They have been under 1/15 for the past year using the same advertising methods.
In fairness, I send far more traffic to Party…. mainly by design, as I have seen better rations of DL/RMP there.
May 12, 2005 at 6:00 pm #665462Anonymous
InactiveI had one more Real money player at Empire today.. Who nows, maybe some more will deposit
. Wow, 1 in 50 really is a sad thing.. -
AuthorPosts