- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
What do you prefer?
I have been looking at % GR but maybe i´ve been fooling myself?
What do you choose and whats your thoughts?Both have merits. Personally I like percentage of Net Win best, but I am also a big fan of percentage of deposits (as long as its for life of player).
Either are superior in the long run to CPA. Just be careful you arent offered percentage of deposit in a hybrid deal and its for first deposit only. I recently had a casino try to slide that in under the radar screen and I caught it and rejected the offer.
Both have merits. Personally I like percentage of Net Win best, but I am also a big fan of percentage of deposits (as long as its for life of player).
Woo Hoo! CPA may look like a quick buck, but long life of the player is best in the long term.
CPA used to be an absolute no-no for me. However, we finally started taking CPAs again very recently and some of them have performed very well.
Ultimately, CPA is not the best choice in every situation – Got2Bet now carries a mix and this delivers better results than having either percentage or CPA alone. As in most cases, YMMV.
I like the gross revenue deal quite a bit.
But before I go any further, that means if the player wins, you still keep 25% of everything they deposited.
right?
now assuming that is correct, there is one draw-back to the gross revenue in comparison to the net win; because if you have a player hit it big; and then the month changes over, you won’t see what surely must be (I’m guessing), but what surely must be about 80% of the time, you will see an excellent month; and likely get back your commission % on everything they won the month before, or at least a very big part of it.
