Get exclusive CAP network offers from top brands

View CAP Offers

Not quite sure what this means…

[bsa_pro_ad_space id=2]
  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #734703
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I seem to recall them having this weird thing where you can add funds to inactive player accounts belonging to other affiliates.

    This issue was brought up a long time ago and as far as I remember it was never dealt with.

    #734706
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Thats for partypoker , used to be that an affiliate would be able to send new sign up money and once they played 5 raked hands the cpa would be triggered . Now if an affilate sends a new player $$ on party they have to earn 200 points about 200 hands instead of 5 .

    This is only for cpa thru interaccount transer , where an aff snd the player there first deposit , not if the player deposits himself

    #734811
    FA_support
    Member

    Trust me, 200 points is NOT 200 hands. I played 5000 hands of NL10$ and only have 110 points so far.

    Points go up much faster at higher limits tho.

    #734818
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    BonusPimps wrote:
    Trust me, 200 points is NOT 200 hands. I played 5000 hands of NL10$ and only have 110 points so far.

    Points go up much faster at higher limits tho.

    $10 buy in or $10 blinds/

    Heres a list of how many hands you need per point

    https://secure.partyaccount.com/pc/pc_details_earnpoints.htm

    #734820
    327007
    Member

    The rule seems to be having a huge effect on me. My RMPs essentially stopped after the rule was implemented. Now I have more than twice as many new depositing players for April as RMPs qualifying for CPA credit.

    #734831
    FA_support
    Member
    the27offsuit wrote:
    $10 buy in or $10 blinds/

    Heres a list of how many hands you need per point

    https://secure.partyaccount.com/pc/pc_details_earnpoints.htm

    Yeah but nobody plays NL1000 (5/10$ blinds) on their first deposit unless they are some kind of millionaire.

    NL10 and NL25 are much more likely

    For NL10 200 points = 3200 raked hands
    For NL25 200 points = 2000 raked hands

    About 1 hand out of 4 is raked in NL 10 (since there is no rake for hands that don’t go past the flop and no for pots under 1$, which are very common). So that means that 200 points = about 12 000 hands. I have 6000 hands in my poker tracker at NL 10 and about 110 Party points so my calculations are pretty good.

    For NL25, we have about 1 hand / 2 which goes to the flop and gets raked. So a player would need about 4000 hands for 200 points.

    #734835
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    BonusPimps wrote:
    Yeah but nobody plays NL1000 (5/10$ blinds) on their first deposit unless they are some kind of millionaire.

    NL10 and NL25 are much more likely

    For NL10 200 points = 3200 raked hands
    For NL25 200 points = 2000 raked hands

    About 1 hand out of 4 is raked in NL 10 (since there is no rake for hands that don’t go past the flop and no for pots under 1$, which are very common). So that means that 200 points = about 12 000 hands. I have 6000 hands in my poker tracker at NL 10 and about 110 Party points so my calculations are pretty good.

    For NL25, we have about 1 hand / 2 which goes to the flop and gets raked. So a player would need about 4000 hands for 200 points.

    Thanks For the Info , as for me im on rev share and i dont transfer money to anyones account so it does not affect me

    #734885
    FA_support
    Member

    Same for me.

    I really don’t understand why anyone would do CPA with a poker room, if you get some regular players it can be such a good long-term and stable revenue.

    #734896
    327007
    Member
    BonusPimps wrote:
    Same for me.

    I really don’t understand why anyone would do CPA with a poker room, if you get some regular players it can be such a good long-term and stable revenue.
    I do CPA with their casino. Party has a casino, as well as a poker room. I am not aware of any inter-account transfers, yet the new rule seems to be having an effect on me.

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)