- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 23, 2007 at 1:01 pm #734703
Anonymous
InactiveI seem to recall them having this weird thing where you can add funds to inactive player accounts belonging to other affiliates.
This issue was brought up a long time ago and as far as I remember it was never dealt with.
April 23, 2007 at 1:08 pm #734706Anonymous
InactiveThats for partypoker , used to be that an affiliate would be able to send new sign up money and once they played 5 raked hands the cpa would be triggered . Now if an affilate sends a new player $$ on party they have to earn 200 points about 200 hands instead of 5 .
This is only for cpa thru interaccount transer , where an aff snd the player there first deposit , not if the player deposits himself
April 24, 2007 at 4:03 pm #734811
FA_supportMemberTrust me, 200 points is NOT 200 hands. I played 5000 hands of NL10$ and only have 110 points so far.
Points go up much faster at higher limits tho.
April 24, 2007 at 4:52 pm #734818Anonymous
InactiveBonusPimps wrote:Trust me, 200 points is NOT 200 hands. I played 5000 hands of NL10$ and only have 110 points so far.Points go up much faster at higher limits tho.
$10 buy in or $10 blinds/
Heres a list of how many hands you need per point
https://secure.partyaccount.com/pc/pc_details_earnpoints.htm
April 24, 2007 at 5:07 pm #734820
327007MemberThe rule seems to be having a huge effect on me. My RMPs essentially stopped after the rule was implemented. Now I have more than twice as many new depositing players for April as RMPs qualifying for CPA credit.
April 24, 2007 at 8:35 pm #734831
FA_supportMemberthe27offsuit wrote:$10 buy in or $10 blinds/Heres a list of how many hands you need per point
https://secure.partyaccount.com/pc/pc_details_earnpoints.htm
Yeah but nobody plays NL1000 (5/10$ blinds) on their first deposit unless they are some kind of millionaire.
NL10 and NL25 are much more likely
For NL10 200 points = 3200 raked hands
For NL25 200 points = 2000 raked handsAbout 1 hand out of 4 is raked in NL 10 (since there is no rake for hands that don’t go past the flop and no for pots under 1$, which are very common). So that means that 200 points = about 12 000 hands. I have 6000 hands in my poker tracker at NL 10 and about 110 Party points so my calculations are pretty good.
For NL25, we have about 1 hand / 2 which goes to the flop and gets raked. So a player would need about 4000 hands for 200 points.
April 24, 2007 at 9:18 pm #734835Anonymous
InactiveBonusPimps wrote:Yeah but nobody plays NL1000 (5/10$ blinds) on their first deposit unless they are some kind of millionaire.NL10 and NL25 are much more likely
For NL10 200 points = 3200 raked hands
For NL25 200 points = 2000 raked handsAbout 1 hand out of 4 is raked in NL 10 (since there is no rake for hands that don’t go past the flop and no for pots under 1$, which are very common). So that means that 200 points = about 12 000 hands. I have 6000 hands in my poker tracker at NL 10 and about 110 Party points so my calculations are pretty good.
For NL25, we have about 1 hand / 2 which goes to the flop and gets raked. So a player would need about 4000 hands for 200 points.
Thanks For the Info , as for me im on rev share and i dont transfer money to anyones account so it does not affect me
April 25, 2007 at 3:06 pm #734885
FA_supportMemberSame for me.
I really don’t understand why anyone would do CPA with a poker room, if you get some regular players it can be such a good long-term and stable revenue.
April 25, 2007 at 5:10 pm #734896
327007MemberBonusPimps wrote:Same for me.I really don’t understand why anyone would do CPA with a poker room, if you get some regular players it can be such a good long-term and stable revenue.
I do CPA with their casino. Party has a casino, as well as a poker room. I am not aware of any inter-account transfers, yet the new rule seems to be having an effect on me. -
AuthorPosts