- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 1, 2006 at 11:55 am #700650
Anonymous
InactiveI dislike them because they foster spamming. Anyone who wants to win basically has to spam the SEs. Not good for the industry, IMO.
August 1, 2006 at 2:56 pm #700669Anonymous
InactiveThe rules have nothing to prevent spamdexing from taking place and winning.
This is totally unethical. and very hurtful to the industry.
August 1, 2006 at 3:44 pm #700675Anonymous
InactiveDominique wrote:The rules have nothing to prevent spamdexing from taking place and winning.This is totally unethical. and very hurtful to the industry.
Exactly right! We need to rid the industry of this crap.
August 1, 2006 at 5:26 pm #700692Anonymous
InactiveDominique wrote:The rules have nothing to prevent spamdexing from taking place and winning.This is totally unethical. and very hurtful to the industry.
Curious, what is the purpose of having all those links in your signature?
August 1, 2006 at 5:30 pm #700695Anonymous
InactiveWhat do you think? Why do you ask?
I always wonder why people ask questions they know the answers to….
August 1, 2006 at 6:11 pm #700702Anonymous
InactiveI asked to get an answer, but you didnt give one. :tooconfus
August 1, 2006 at 7:21 pm #700709Anonymous
InactiveIn my opinion, signature links aren’t unethical. They don’t hurt the industry.
August 1, 2006 at 8:33 pm #700725Anonymous
InactiveAt first glance it would seem that way, but just as spamdexing can fill the SERPS up with unrelated BS, spamming multiple signature links (8 to one site)can work in much the same way.
August 1, 2006 at 8:50 pm #700730
vladcizsolMemberSignatures are generally good. I use them and its not perceived as an unethical practice UNLESS its abused. IE a poster ONLY posts crap just to get the links in their signs displayed at Message Boards, Guest Books or blogs.
August 2, 2006 at 12:00 am #700738Anonymous
InactiveOK then – you can look at my signature too
:hehe: -
AuthorPosts