Get exclusive CAP network offers from top brands

View CAP Offers

NEW Amazing Casino for US players

[bsa_pro_ad_space id=2]
  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 34 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #740873
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Is this the best ever Slots Landing page or waht :)

    http://www.rushmorecasino.com/games/online-slots

    #740886
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Yeah – one of the better ones IMO.

    Why are you pimping these guys so hard, though? It’s almost like you are the affiliate manager :)

    #740935
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @kwblue 129204 wrote:

    Yeah – one of the better ones IMO.

    Why are you pimping these guys so hard, though? It’s almost like you are the affiliate manager :)

    II know guys behind rushmore for few years and we always had great business relationship. What’s more i love to promote high quality product.

    #740942
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @eclipse 129261 wrote:

    … and i hate when people say BS about other without any solid proof.

    What the hell is that about?? I didn’t say anything bad, just questioned your motive for the constant pimping of Rushmore.

    In fact, I even said that the slots page was one of the best I’ve seen – that is definitely not ‘BS without solid proof’. Although I admit it is my opinion (maybe that is considered BS around here?) :confused:

    #740945
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @kwblue 129268 wrote:

    What the hell is that about?? I didn’t say anything bad, just questioned your motive for the constant pimping of Rushmore.

    In fact, I even said that the slots page was one of the best I’ve seen – that is definitely not ‘BS without solid proof’. Although I admit it is my opinion (maybe that is considered BS around here?) :confused:

    Sorry for that. BS remark was not directed to You.

    #740950
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Honestly places giving out $888 as a bonus haven’t had the greatest reputation in the past :wink-wink I admit that’s a poor measure to go by though. I will stick to the established RTGs if I ever decide to promote any it will be Bodog (hate the neg carryover) and Inetbet.

    #740953
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    the slots page looks sweet. i can’t wait to put it up

    #741215
    nick777
    Member

    Club USA is TOP NOTCH and always has been.

    Indeed. I have nothing but great things to say about Club USA.

    #741304
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Looks a lot like a CPAYS casino to me…

    #741541
    PatrickM
    Member

    @kwblue 122050 wrote:

    Club USA is TOP NOTCH and always has been. There are several RTG’s that are 100% on the ‘up and up’. We really have to stop saying crap like this which taints the whole pool. :(

    Agreed. I know the guys from Club USA, they are good guys…

    I also think tarring everyone with the same brush just because they use software that other licensees have abused is highly unfair. For example, some of the Playtech Casinos that were given a bad rep then you look at the company I used to work for (Betfred) who are a good outfit.

    Props to Martyn for continuing the good work there and servicing the affiliate industry.

    #742986
    PokerXanadu
    Member

    Hey Guys,

    i’m looking for distributions for my offers, can anyone help?

    Thanks in advance

    #743051
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    There are a handful of good RTGs and I agree with the sentiment that you shouldn’t just assume a new RTG is bad.

    However, RTG themselves have created a general sense of scepticism, particularly among players, by basically allowing the Cloud casinos to continue their unethical practices, ditching the Montana player resolution service altogether and generally licensing software to anyone it would seem. They’ve basically held their hands up and said “not interested” which is poor form.

    MG, Wagerworks, Crypto and even to a lesser extent Playtech have all taken some responsibility for the credence of their operators and that’s a far more professional approach.

    It’s tough on the good RTG casinos like CWC, iNet and Bodog, but for me the only thing to do is give new operators a year or two to see how they perform, then make a decision.

    #743086
    PatrickM
    Member

    @Simmo! 131849 wrote:

    However, RTG themselves have created a general sense of scepticism, particularly among players, by basically allowing the Cloud casinos to continue their unethical practices, ditching the Montana player resolution service altogether and generally licensing software to anyone it would seem. They’ve basically held their hands up and said “not interested” which is poor form.

    Hey Simmo, good post. I don’t think they “ditched” Montana as such. They are in the process of setting up a new external body, when it will be available who knows! I can see your point though, they need to sort something out before the big tar brush wipes over the good casinos.

    We want to get some RTG skins too, so I am all about keeping their nose clean if I can.

    #743206
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Hi all,

    agree with Simmo.

    RTG has dug its own grave. too bad for quality casinos powered by them but its basically the truth.

    I can’t in good mind …… promote any of them for fear I’ll ruin a good relationship with readers. I have however promoted club USA for a while…. after testing them out.

    the thing is …… you got to make sure players are happy. they find out that any casino powered by a certain software ……. is questionable ……. and they run……. and rightly so.

    again i wish it was a better situation for those undeserving of this rep. they don’t and haven’t bought the grave that RTG has allowed to be dug.

    sad but true. tread wisely my friends.

    #743221
    PatrickM
    Member

    I wouldn’t drop a good licensee just because the software company has let others abuse their product. CWC are a reputable company, they keep their players and you satisfied, therefore, there is no reason to drop them right?

    GA Partners are looking at other products and RTG may be one of them. I think that there must be some distinction drawn between the software provider and the licensee.

    If you want to list any software provider then I can pretty much guarantee that there was a brand that was associated with it that was sketchy.

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 34 total)