- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 2, 2006 at 6:01 pm #700820
Anonymous
InactiveIt is supposed to be the first scenario. If the aff program has a high minimum payment, and then takes away money that you made in previous months, then you can see that they have the high minimum for a reason. So they don’t have to live up to their promise of no negatives.
August 2, 2006 at 6:22 pm #700823Anonymous
InactiveAgreed, if they carry over your positives, then subtract the negative, then it’s the same as a negative carryover in my book.
August 2, 2006 at 7:10 pm #700824Anonymous
InactiveSeveral programs do the later! :devil:
August 2, 2006 at 9:17 pm #700838Anonymous
InactiveThis could be accidental – but probably not.
If you’re taking 6 months to reach $250 – then they’re probably giving you a hint.
:eh:August 2, 2006 at 9:57 pm #700840Anonymous
InactiveHey Engineer,
Like the masses, I too believe it should be scenario one if there is NO rollover. Your positive balance shouldn’t be set back at all until you reach threshold and empty it all out when payment is issued.

Anyhow, perhaps it would be worthwhile checking the T&Cs and seeking clarification.
Cheers,
Sara
August 2, 2006 at 9:58 pm #700841Anonymous
InactiveThe numbers I posted were made up. For a newbie, it could very well take 6 months or longer to bank $250.
For the record — I have been in contact (today) with one of the programs in question. Their explanation was that I had a chargeback that needed to be paid back. :rasberry: I pretty much have to take their word for it and move on.
I am still waiting to hear back from the other program. I hope I don’t get the “chargeback” explanation again…..
August 3, 2006 at 7:45 pm #700949Anonymous
InactiveUpdate —
The other program fixed the problem. They recalculated the numbers the right way (i.e. without negative carryover), and they’re sending me some cabbage this week. :thumbsup: :highflyer
-
AuthorPosts