- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 12, 2005 at 12:27 am #660011
Anonymous
InactiveI am no expert in this, but I have played it and thought about it when running into the same or similair situations.
I think they always pick the choice with the least risk of loss, not the gratest chance of winning.
January 12, 2005 at 3:41 am #660023Anonymous
InactiveAlthough I haven’t used it much at all, I do believe that the MicroGaming expert mode is holding the cards for the highest return. Steve’s examples are correct plays in regular Jacks or Better games.
January 12, 2005 at 2:17 pm #660031Anonymous
InactiveMicrogaming claimed to have retained experts to do their probabilities and plan the autoplay strategy – they of course did not release the names of these experts and some of us gave them a huge shellacking because of the obvious errors in strategy.
I will drive that point home again later this month.
January 12, 2005 at 4:14 pm #660041Anonymous
InactiveSpear, do you have specific examples where the strategy is inaccurate? I don’t remember the auto-hold ever disagreeing with me on Jacks or Better, which is a game that I play perfectly. Note that I’ve never played any of the other Microgaming varieties so I have no experience with them.
January 12, 2005 at 9:42 pm #660064Anonymous
InactiveI don’t have any specifics – and I don’t play Jacks or Better, but I swear some of the decisions it makes in Aces and Faces and Deuces Wild confound me – maybe it’s me that’s wrong, but it just doesn’t seem right.
We gave them a little hell specifically over blackjack, can’t remember any specific reference to video poker.
January 13, 2005 at 2:46 pm #660090Anonymous
InactiveI’ve seen what i thought were odd holds in the past but if you check the “Analyse” button in Expert mode, i always found the percentages matched the choice of hold, so i’ve come to believe its ok in the games i play – DW and Joker Poker mainly.
Simmo!
January 13, 2005 at 7:14 pm #660105Anonymous
Guestman this has been enlightening. lol. I never realized how badly I must play. No wonder the only way I can seem to come out ahead at VP is by using the double or nothing option.
January 13, 2005 at 7:20 pm #660106Anonymous
Guestcan somebody explain to me how it is a better play to keep an ace of diamonds and a king of clubs instead of tossing one of them in hopes of getting the royal flush?
this is in jacks or better.
ps.
the above may not be an exact example of what I have seen but I do know that it has told me to keep two cards that are not suited which I found extremely curious since the big payout is the royal flush.
January 13, 2005 at 7:42 pm #660109Anonymous
InactiveHolding unsuited A-K is better than holding just one of the two because you’ll get your money back by pairing the King or the Ace more often. Yes, you can’t hit the royal, but drawing 4 cards to the royal is a huge long shot anyway.
If you’d like to see the exact numbers, assuming a $1 game where you’ve bet $5:
AK unsuited is worth about $2.39.
An Ace alone is worth $2.32.
A King alone is worth $2.30.January 13, 2005 at 8:52 pm #660113Anonymous
InactiveWhat program is generating those numbers? Looks really interesting, I didn’t even think of it that way.
January 13, 2005 at 11:11 pm #660124Anonymous
InactiveBy far the best way to learn accurate VP strategy is to use software to practice. Those particular numbers came from Bob Dancer WinPoker, but that’s just because I didn’t have my preferred software at the office.
The best-of-breed these days is Frugal Video Poker which will let you practice, analyze hands, and also generate strategy charts, all in one program.
If that sounds like a sales plug, it might be! :woo-hoo:
I sell it on my site, here:
http://www.blackjackinfo.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=22&products_id=44 -
AuthorPosts