- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
I am promoting Inetbet also since longer time
and in total i have 36 depositors
I always wonder why its so hard to get more depositing players there
everywhere you read good comments about inetbet
I like that casino too, they always pay your winnings fast.And they always pay affiliate in earnings in time
Never had any delays.Player support is also really good even they not offer live chat or phone
but they do answer e-mails really fast.In total I have to say, its a very good casino.
Maybe my traffic is just not for Inetbet.
On the other end,
If i watch the last months
I did not get many new players at most RTG casinos.We webmasters just have no way to prove whether the stats from the affiliate programs, mainly the Net Revenue we can share , are trustworthy or not !
Inspiration;177914 wrote:these stats are from inetbet, not earned 1$ who has comparable ones ?
i do not accuse inetbet of anything just want to avoid a marketing failure.
I promoted the 10 free chip as well as the regular bonus but always with the same results. They told me heads up, hang in there………….:Cry:Number of Clickthroughs: 2688 Number of Downloaders: 2260 Number of Players: 1273 Number of New Depositors: 30 Total Initial Deposits: $748.00 Total Deposits: $12,665.03 Net Win: $11,683.44 Coupon Amounts Awarded: $13,589.55 Manager Credit Amounts Awarded: $672.53 ChargeBacks: $0.00 Net Profit: (Net Win – Coupons – Credits – Chargebacks) ($818.75) Amount Deducted: $0.00 Amount Miscellaneous Adjustments: $0.00 Amount Added For Reversed Bans: $0.00 Amount Earned From Tiers: $0.00 Amount Earned: ($818.75) “Last month one player won over $6000 and another won around $3000 in March”
R.
Hi all (R)
You can get a good idea whether they are being honest with you but it takes an investment.
It will be the best money you ever spent no matter how you look at it. You would of course have to deposit and win/lose to see if it shows up but if you send a player (not yourself or anybody in same name/geo region/otherwise can be connected to you) and have them play and if you win you cash out of course and then come back later under different name and have them pay for the audit (the casino) … but assuming you lose then you check your stats to see if it shows up.
Nobody but you who knows your stats so well … can probably watch this unfold and be able to spot anything worthy of red flagging … but it should give you a good idea of where you stand.
if you don’t see some movement of a size that one would associate with the amount you sent to be lost to the casino then its a red flag. Any time stats don’t feel right or you have a reason to question them … and its a program that is under-producing … thats a big time combination for trouble.
If you spot a problem it then depends on how far you want to go with it? I personally believe that if a program hasn’t made decent income and then when I test them (in an admitted loose fashion but hey, only person I have to convince is myself and I’m not a fair-minded kingdom when it comes to circumstance where I see the sponsor has given almost exactly the amount of deposits …. back to the players in form of manager credits … which I cassume you are never paid for the amount given back in manager credits. Is that correct?)
anyway if i see an under-producer with a problem such as not showing income in the manner that logic would dictate … then that’s enough for me. Time to move on to greener pastures. There are enough out there and times are going to get harder I fear … that there is no reason to waste resources with a program where in the end … you’re spinning your wheels instead of seeing a continual growth of income like common sense would suggest.
my experience is that if you trust your instincts you’ll seldom feel wrong, but you gotta have some …. things in your pants when you assess your situation and not a bean counter with a greedy conservative side.
If you think a program is screwing you … they probably are. If you don’t take action for the screwing your getting now then you deserve the bigger one you’ll get later.
That is especially true for those that are supporting blasters with that predatory term that forces you to continue sending new players … anybody still in for that is either so overwhelmingly trapped by finances they literally can’t cut out the cancer without cutting a juglar … or (and I apologize for such strong lang cause I like you guys but apparently if it offends you then you need some strong lang to wake you the hell up! … but I am sorry for saying it) … or you’re STUPID!!!
The current state of the blasters network’s terms is so blatantly outrageous that …. that is the only thing that makes it acceptable.
Granted that they added it retro is not acceptable but once they did it without regard … everybody should have right then cut losses … because otherwise now we have this … now what makes anybody think they’ll be better off a year from now?
You won’t be because you’ll have added another year’s worth of real depositing players to the “won’t be getting any of the residuals from these players when I retire” … list. Instead of having added those players to the list of sponsors that will honor their contracts.
I know its hard to walk away from a made income and likely those that heed my advice will later curse me because they will have lost that revenue source but in the end you will thank me when you shut down, … sell or whatever with your site and you still have all those years of accumulated players paying you resids … that you earned … that the casino would otherwise pocket … and don’t think they don’t salivate over that thought … which is why blasters has that term …
and about a year into things you’ll be saying “man I”m glad I listened to bb1 and stopped the bleeding then instead of not having the money now … who knows how long these resids will last but at least we didn’t see our income drop from all to nothing in 30 days “.
here’s the thing.blasters have just about reached their peak of exposure. Just about anybody who gambles online has heard of golden palace … (good or bad but that is aside this particular point) … so they don’t really need affs anymore … I mean if worse case scenario … they can ride on GP’s infamous presence for a long, long time and still probably make about as much as if they actually paid affs and made an honest advertising effort because the only fresh faces for them are those yet to come on line.
I mean why else wouldn’t they make a better effort at their overall approach to everything they do.
they don’t seem to be around to answer … if they are around they surely don’t strike my memory as being the kind of AMs I’d ever want … and this all from a program that at one time was in a position to do some really big things … but they never seemed to get past the dime in front of them for the dollar beyond.
If you look at their history here at CAP you’ll see they have always been plagued with issues .. seemingly just addressing one before the next arrived … and that was in their “good” days.
Maybe you’re throwing good money after bad.
While your messing around with a program that causes you grief a good profitable program may be missing out. For me personally I do not have time for non-sense, when I conclude that “no matter how I slice it, it comes out the same” I move on.I have a number of players in my affiliate program already and this program does not show stats for individuals.
I might have to deposit a large sum of money and win/lose big to test with your
method. :Cry:bb1webs;177996 wrote:Hi all (R)You can get a good idea whether they are being honest with you but it takes an investment.
It will be the best money you ever spent no matter how you look at it. You would of course have to deposit and win/lose to see if it shows up but if you send a player (not yourself or anybody in same name/geo region/otherwise can be connected to you) and have them play and if you win you cash out of course and then come back later under different name and have them pay for the audit (the casino) … but assuming you lose then you check your stats to see if it shows up.
Nobody but you who knows your stats so well … can probably watch this unfold and be able to spot anything worthy of red flagging … but it should give you a good idea of where you stand.
if you don’t see some movement of a size that one would associate with the amount you sent to be lost to the casino then its a red flag. Any time stats don’t feel right or you have a reason to question them … and its a program that is under-producing … thats a big time combination for trouble.
If you spot a problem it then depends on how far you want to go with it? I personally believe that if a program hasn’t made decent income and then when I test them (in an admitted loose fashion but hey, only person I have to convince is myself and I’m not a fair-minded kingdom when it comes to circumstance where I see the sponsor has given almost exactly the amount of deposits …. back to the players in form of manager credits … which I cassume you are never paid for the amount given back in manager credits. Is that correct?)
anyway if i see an under-producer with a problem such as not showing income in the manner that logic would dictate … then that’s enough for me. Time to move on to greener pastures. There are enough out there and times are going to get harder I fear … that there is no reason to waste resources with a program where in the end … you’re spinning your wheels instead of seeing a continual growth of income like common sense would suggest.
Hi Inspiration,
I have only just seen this thread.
Please email me on [email protected] and I can have a look into things for you.
It looks like you have a lot of free chip players. Although you have had depositing players either these have won or there have been a number of withdrawals from the free chip.
I can however assure you that there would not be anything untoward happening.
Once I have your details I can give you more information.
Best Regards
iNetBet PromosThank you for posting in this thread, Inetbet.
Personally, I have seen many months like the above, but I have also seen good months with Inetbet. Frankly, I only carry Inetbet because of their player reputation and because they tend to have good retention of the occasional whale. But I have a business model where I promote many different places and if one takes a dive it doesn’t affect the bottom line much.
I personally dislike places where the amount of bonuses awarded exceeds the amount of deposits. Especially if we are supposed to pay for it in real money – it’s not real money. It never existed until we pay it out of pocket. Add in negative carry over, and you are not looking at a profitable affiliation.
What always concerns me on RTG casinos from the fre chips is the max withdraw. I have seen people win $6,000 on a free chips that has a max payout of $200, but it seems like the affiliates get hit for $6000 when they only pay out $200.
I NEVER get a good answer on this.
