- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 13, 2004 at 8:17 pm #647971
Anonymous
InactiveI’ve always agreed with this approach. It’s why I was the first to take down Rich Webmaster casinos when there was the first sign that they were failing to pay in a timely manner.
It’s also why I took down Iglobalmedia casinos way back when they had the old software and there was speculation that the software was rigged. Those casinos were making me a ton of money, especially zantana and starluck. I advertise starluck again but it’s only because they’ve upgraded the software. I was probably wrong about the problems with the software in the first place but I did not want to risk it.
Same thing happened with casinopaycheck casinos. There was a lot of negative information concerning them, they were also dumping worthless stock on uninformed investors. I wasn’t making much with them but it was a decent amount of money. In this case removing them was a great move, all of those casinos are gone except for the one i never promoted, and now i’ve read somewhere that they are not paying affiliates.
There’s probably a couple more but I cant remember them right now. It makes more moral and business sense to send your traffic to established casinos that have proven themselves. I still have players playing at captain cook’s from the year 2000! Had i sent those players elsewhere for a quick buck they would be gone.
Antoine
April 13, 2004 at 8:40 pm #647972
vladcizsolMemberAgreed. Hopefully this would fall under common sense for most webmasters.
The affiliates who have no conscience probably wont care what we say. The good news is they tend to burn out of the business quickly before they can do too much damage.
-
AuthorPosts