- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
If it were me… I’d block the IP.
Hmmm… Do you do that by adding a rule to the .htaccess file? Or to the robots.txt file?
Okay, I blocked it with .htaccess, and it worked. The hits have stopped. :xmas:
Here’s the code I added to my .htaccess file, if anyone is interested:
order allow,deny
deny from 64.5.245.23
allow from all [/CODE][CODE]order allow,deny
deny from 64.5.245.23
allow from all [/CODE]perfect. I wasn’t sure which, but figured .htaccess would block a bot as well (if it only used 1 IP address). Anyone know for sure?
I was gonna say: are you sure its a bad thing before you block it?
I don’t know crapola about all this but seems to me it’d be a shame to find out later it was a SE spider.
… just a thought.
Steve, you were right! I did a more detailed search, and it turns out that this was a spider from the GenieKnows search engine. GAAAHHH!!!
I wonder why the spider didn’t identify itself properly in my stats, and in the Whois information? If they would just name the thing “GenieKnows Bot” or something, this whole thing wouldn’t have happened. :sarcasm:
This IP spidered my site too, good to know if it is a SE bot
Thanks guys!
Steve, you were right!
you know what they say: even a blind squirrel finds an acorn once in a while.
I’m surprised … pleasantly, to hear GenieKnows is spidering. I thought they were strictly a PPC (one which I have avoided after initially trying out).
I went ahead and banned this IP. It was using 1 gig a month in bandwidth and never left my site. It seems like this spider is not programmed correctly. I hope I did the right thing, it was a waste of bandwidth though.
Engineer wrote:If they would just name the thing “GenieKnows Bot” or something, this whole thing wouldn’t have happened. :sarcasm:I could name myself “GenieKnows Bot” if I liked. User agent spoofing is easy. That’s why user agent based cloaking is a bad idea.
But, yeah, I see your point. I’d also think they’d be smart to identify their IP better. IP spoofing is a different game.
