- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 25, 2006 at 7:29 am #707235
Anonymous
InactiveIm new myself, but I am pretty sure thet are loyal to theire affiliates.. After all, they are the biggest online casino (or at least claim to be)
Anyways, the reason they got so much critizm is becuase they allow (or allowed) theire affiliates to use sneaky ways or promoting them as black hatting, cloaking, ect.
But if they are listed on this site they are legit!
September 25, 2006 at 7:52 am #707236Anonymous
InactiveDoes anyone know if they have negative carry overs?
September 25, 2006 at 12:02 pm #707243Anonymous
InactiveGood:
Casino Profit Share
Casino Rewards
Gaming Partners
CWC Affiliates
Revenue Giants
32Red Affiliates
Wager Share
Partner Logic
Roxy Affiliates
BrightshareBAD:
888
Cpays
Party PokerSeptember 25, 2006 at 12:08 pm #707244Anonymous
InactiveWhat about Fortune and Income access, I´m not sure about them:hmmm:
September 25, 2006 at 1:30 pm #707250Anonymous
Inactivehens00 wrote:Hi guys,
Im new to promoting casino affiliates and wanted to know if 888.com are a reliable company to deal with. By this I mean, do they pay out on time?!I have researched about their refusal to ban affiliates who use underhand marketing techniques, but I feel that their comission scheme is a lot better than the casinos I have found so far.
I would like to know if anyone has had any troubles with them at all?
Many thanks
HenryThat is a no, the day the become reliable and act in a professional business like manner there will be peace in the Middle East. I personally would avoid 888 like I would avoid driving while under the influence “crash and burn”.
But hey its’ a personal choice and life is full of them. Don’t let them fool you into thinking you are doing them a favor by promoting them because you are not. 888 relies on but a few webmasters to earn their bucks and I highly doubt you would be included.
The same goes for cpays. I would follow the Engineer’s “good” casinos list to promote.
I better stop now before I get carried away. greek39
September 25, 2006 at 1:42 pm #707252Anonymous
InactiveGoldfinger wrote:What about Fortune and Income access, I´m not sure about them:hmmm:I like Income Access. I don’t promote Fortune, but many people do, and many people are happy with them.September 25, 2006 at 3:17 pm #707268Anonymous
InactiveActually, 888 has made a good faith effort in Vegas to find a doable way to act proactively against blackhatters, i.e. locating them in the serps and dealing with them.
They are very interested in the CAP anti blackhat program also.
I have put them on probation and if the present path continues am going to lift the blacklisting all the way.
My motive is always problem resolution, and 888 is actively working towards it.
Can’t say that about CPays or Party. They remain uncooperative and uncommunicative.
Communication is the first step towards resolution of problems, lack of it shows lack of interest to fix issues. Party communicated for a bit, but has not fixed things and has fallen back into total noncommunication.
September 25, 2006 at 3:21 pm #707269Anonymous
InactiveEngineer wrote:I like Income Access. I don’t promote Fortune, but many people do, and many people are happy with them.Fortune are sound when it comes to paying and general day-to-day stuff plus good promotions at the casinos too, but there’s always the niggling feeling of uncertainty after the aborted retroactive episode last year which makes me hesitant to go too gung-ho in promoting them. To be fair, they handled the recent addition of a new payment scheme far better, even if it is potentially less lucrative than the “classic” revshare.
888 locked my affiliate account for “lack of activity” soon after the recent spam stuff surfaced. Sort of a Catch-22…I wanted players to have a choice but warned them about the 5-day wait for a payout so that they had their expectations filled up front. Consequently they probably signed up elsewhere and then 888 close my account – lol. I’m clearly expendable

Some programs have stuck with me even when I’ve not provided much traffic and I’ll repay that one day.
September 25, 2006 at 3:32 pm #707273Anonymous
InactiveSimmo! wrote:Fortune are sound when it comes to paying and general day-to-day stuff plus good promotions at the casinos too, but there’s always the niggling feeling of uncertainty after the aborted retroactive episode last year which makes me hesitant to go too gung-ho in promoting them.888 locked my affiliate account for “lack of activity” soon after the recent spam stuff surfaced. I’m clearly small fry. Some programs have stuck with me even when I’ve not provided much traffic and I’ll repay that one day.
Fortune has redeemed itself in my book, all going well and no clouds in the sky there now.
Re. locked accounts – programs that do that bite themselves. You never know who will be the next big affiliate. Especially large directories often suddenly take off and individual places do well all of a sudden, and small sites can do that too. Not a sound policy.
September 25, 2006 at 5:17 pm #707281Anonymous
Inactive888 :bullshit: Nothing more to say; its all been said.
Fortune :bullshit: Way too many stats and spam issues in the past for redemption.
September 25, 2006 at 5:25 pm #707282Anonymous
InactiveHow about Fortune Affiliates. I personaly think they are great.:woo-hoo:
September 25, 2006 at 5:46 pm #707284Anonymous
InactiveHi Damian,
Why would you say that? Please explain.
Thanks
BettySeptember 25, 2006 at 6:57 pm #707293Anonymous
Inactivea friend of mine started to promote poker (light methods, with paid PPC traffic), and after $800 or more in earnings 888 closed his poker affiliate account, because, they said, ONE player was fraudulent. So, if they don’t care about marketing methods (in the past I hope), they care about their current profits only.
September 25, 2006 at 9:21 pm #707307Anonymous
InactiveFortune and Income Access are both great, and there isn’t much difference between how they compensate and how 888 compensates. If you are looking at CPA most everyone here would advise against it, though at last look, Fortune had the best CPA deal.
As for 888, they locked our account for supposed bad traffic (bonus abuse or chargebacks). You can take a look at our site, but there is no way that a claim of bad traffic can be supported. More likely, we had very little traffic for them and the one person that signed up was a chargeback or something, so they got tired of forwarding the negative amount each month. Oh yeah, they have negative carry-over, another reason not to use them.
September 25, 2006 at 10:34 pm #707317Anonymous
InactiveAre 888.com reliable?
They’re scumbags – don’t go near them.
They close affiliate accounts for ‘bonus abuse’ where there is none.
AVOID at ALL costs. They ripped me off for over $70K.
shoevenus
-
AuthorPosts