- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
This has been one of my arguments, can the Internet be included in the Wire Act? I personally do not think so it would require a Constitutional changes.
greek39
But Cabot said the measure exempts state-licensed casinos, which could conduct online poker or casino-style wagering within their states once authorized to do so – and also could link up with other states or even foreign jurisdictions where such gambling isn’t prohibited.
Exactly what I have said.
Learn from the monopoly game you played as a kid.
:popcorn:
“For fantasy sports, they have to be ecstatic because this completely takes any taint of illegality away from them, and gives them an opportunity to grow maybe three-, four-, five-fold,” Cabot said.
This is real interesting, 1st will there be a bunch of affiliate programs setting up to promote this and 2nd would this not in a way turn into a form of sportsbook betting, say maybe fantasy sportsbooks?
Maybe I will do a full article on this BS over the weekend and post it here. Because many people are missing some very important points. The internet is a non governace entity. There is no Government who can control it nor define it. How will congress define the internet so it fits nicely into the wire act when they don’t even know what it is?
I am off for this weekend but time permitting I will do the article.
greek39 wrote:This has been one of my arguments, can the Internet be included in the Wire Act?Cabot said the Justice Department has contended that the act does apply to nonsports betting, but that argument has been successfully challenged in federal court.
Precedence has already been set in several cases. :drink:
