- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
PR4 gambling site.
Agreed.
I bought some PR6 text links from a site about old TV shows once, and it was a waste of money. I received no additional traffic, and my PR stayed the same.
Newbie mistake — never again. 
Links from unrelated sites generally won’t “hurt” your site; they just won’t do anything to “help” it.
Engineer wrote:Agreed.I bought some PR6 text links from a site about old TV shows once, and it was a waste of money. I received no additional traffic, and my PR stayed the same. .
But did your serp go up?
No. :unhappy:
I beleive inbounds link do not have to be site related only if they are one way. If a website decides to add your link thats a good thing. But your out bound links should be site related.
So fo PR inbounds matters I would prefer gambling inbounds. But If my concern was for PR I would love the NewYorkTimes to inbound to my site one way.greek39
Talking about 2 different things. A link from any authority site will help, like the New York Times. Just any old high PR link from an unrelated site may help a little, but may not at all, and it is highly unlikely that it can hurt you in any way. I would say impossible, but I do not know that to be 100% true. To answer your question, the PR4 gambling site. Also, the link value depends on which search engine you are talking about.
Do poker sites and gambling sites count as related?
I think so, but poker to poker is better than casino to poker in my opinion.
I would rather have a inbound link from a unrelated site of a PR9 than a gambling site of a PR4, just for page rank. For traffic I would prefer a inbound from a PR4gambling site. So yes there are very seperate issues. There is a great example of this somewhere on this forum. greek39
