- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
Well, If you want make it a site dedicated to tell the story of how 32Red has harassed you, as there is a great president on humor and reporting sites while using trade names as perfectly legal.
@allfreechips 230348 wrote:
Well, If you want make it a site dedicated to tell the story of how 32Red has harassed you, as there is a great president on humor and reporting sites while using trade names as perfectly legal.
That is a great idea. I may do that…. I will think about it….. On the other hand, when they serve me I may have to keep the site as is. But I will look into it..
Thanks..
@allfreechips 230348 wrote:
Well, If you want make it a site dedicated to tell the story of how 32Red has harassed you, as there is a great president on humor and reporting sites while using trade names as perfectly legal.
Make sure you optimize the heck out of it so that it stings!
Since they hold a mark in the UK, you might consider blocking the entire UK by IP and/or forward the site to this humor page.
I’ve got a feeling they didn’t find you by chance, likely some blowhard / brownnosing bumwad tipped them off to your existence. Plenty of unethical twits out there screwing over the industry at every turn so that they can make a bigger buck.
@arkyt 230363 wrote:
Make sure you optimize the heck out of it so that it stings!
Since they hold a mark in the UK, you might consider blocking the entire UK by IP and/or forward the site to this humor page.
I’ve got a feeling they didn’t find you by chance, likely some blowhard / brownnosing bumwad tipped them off to your existence. Plenty of unethical twits out there screwing over the industry at every turn so that they can make a bigger buck.
I notice also that they are not making comments here on CAP. It is my personal opinion that they will not, because they, in my opinion, will hurt their position as they are doing on GPWA; moreover, again this is just my opinion..
I also received, what appears to be to the best of my recollection and opinion, a private message from a member stating the they sent HIM a private message telling them to stop siding with me.
If they server you legally let me know and ill add them back and rogue them on my network.
@allfreechips 230378 wrote:
If they server you legally let me know and ill add them back and rogue them on my network.
I will tune in and watch.. lol I appreciate the support too..
Also, I am still keeping your earlier advice in mind, as well…. I just need to find the time…
Thanks..
i also support you. 32 is a number and 32red doesnt own it. and if your domain exists efore 32red, why dont you ask them to change there domain name.
@casinobonuseslisting 230504 wrote:
i also support you. 32 is a number and 32red doesnt own it. and if your domain exists efore 32red, why dont you ask them to change there domain name.
* * * * The statements below are my opinions only, and are to the best of my recollection * * * *
Thanks. That is a factor, in my opinion, as well as the Trade Marks and The William Hill case “The UK mark: validity” definition. In my opinion, I don’t fall into the definition nor am I a Casino. I don’t provide Casino Services or take money directly from customers, in my opinion, per their Trade Marks.
Here are their Trade Marks to the best of my recollection:
UK Trade Mark: 2509861 “32”
EU Trade Mark: 8398695 “32”
EU Trade Mark: 2907426 “32red”
EU Trade Mark: 2814424 “32red”
US Trade Mark: 78,654,867 “32red”
I urge everyone to look-up these trade marks on the EU, UK, and US Trade Mark database and to download the William Hill case, (Public Record) to fully understand the actual definition. It takes a bit of time to reference the article numbers, but this is the only way to fully understand it; moreover, I also do not claim to fully understand it, as my statements are only my opinions.
Thanks..
* * * * The statements above are my opinions only, and are to the best of my recollection * * * *
@casinobonuseslisting 230504 wrote:
i also support you. 32 is a number and 32red doesnt own it. and if your domain exists efore 32red, why dont you ask them to change there domain name.
* * * * The statements below are my opinions only, and are to the best of my recollection * * * *
Thanks. That is a factor, in my opinion, as well as the Trade Marks and The William Hill case “The UK mark: validity” definition. In my opinion, I don’t fall into the definition nor am I a Casino. I don’t provide Casino Services or take money directly from customers, in my opinion, per their Trade Marks.
Here are their Trade Marks to the best of my recollection:
UK Trade Mark: 2509861 “32”
EU Trade Mark: 8398695 “32”
EU Trade Mark: 2907426 “32red”
EU Trade Mark: 2814424 “32red”
US Trade Mark: 78,654,867 “32red”
I urge everyone to look-up these trade marks on the EU, UK, and US Trade Mark database and to download the William Hill case, (Public Record) to fully understand the actual definition. It takes a bit of time to reference the article numbers, but this is the only way to fully understand it; moreover, I also do not claim to fully understand it, as my statements are only my opinions.
I also wanted to state that CAP and GPWA’s forum are located in the US, so stating that this is my opinion is my right under US law and the constitution. I was accused by their rep on GPWA, in my opinion and to my best recall, of making “an allegation”. Opinion IS the key word here..
Thanks..
Sorry, didn’t mean to double post…
* * * * The statements above are my opinions only, and are to the best of my recollection * * * *
I said over at GPWA that I was no longer going to post my opinions on the subject, but I just wanted to clarify a couple of things here if I may…
@32x 230365 wrote:
I notice also that they are not making comments here on CAP. It is my personal opinion that they will not, because they, in my opinion, will hurt their position as they are doing on GPWA; moreover, again this is just my opinion..
As stated on GPWA, I chose to reply there as that’s the first forum you posted on, nothing else.
@32x 230365 wrote:
I also received, what appears to be to the best of my recollection and opinion, a private message from a member stating the they sent HIM a private message telling them to stop siding with me.
As far as I know, I am the only person from 32 commenting on the forums, so I am assuming this was meant to be from me. I can confirm this is absolute nonsense and, although they will already have access, I will gladly allow any forum administrator access to my sent PMs.
Regards,
Mark* * * * The statements below are my opinions only, and are to the best of my recollection * * * *
I thought that I would update my situation status, as this issue has not been resolved and this is a matter to be resolved outside the forum. But, I did feel that some of you may be curious, so here goes.
Despite one threatening phone call from a solicitor that didn’t know US Federal Law (JD Sallen VS Corinthians specifically – which gives domain owners the right to push Domain cases to the US Federal Court of Appeals), the history of my domain, much less his own client’s information, I have seen nothing to make me believe that there is any intention to pursue litigation, WIPO or otherwise. I know that there were some comments about why being in the US makes a difference. Believe me, it does. ICANN and WIPO list this information, as well as the US Federal Court of Appeals (US precedent above). I am only stating this because I know that there are Americans here in the forum and this is information that protects us from foreign companies trying to unjustly steal our domains and traffic by exercising false threats and non-applicable trademarks domestically and abroad.
As well, their US trademark is still not in effect, their Assignment of Ownership has been granted and now they have filed a Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) extension, which grants them another 6 months to sign their Assignment Of Ownership. Why not exercise the ownership of your trademark? Once you get your Registration number, which you quoted in your Cease and Desist that does not apply since it is for “The Word” only, you can exercise your trademark. I am sure that there are lots of domains with your company name in them, of course it’s not mine.
Here is the bottom line.
You guys were man enough to come on here and post your “Push to Assert IP Rights”, now be man enough to either start litigatation precedings or admit that you have no intention of pursuing anything.
I don’t know about you but I have 5 years to file suit against you in US Federal Court under the US Statute of Limitations with respect to Cease and Desist letters.
I am very sorry that I had to post this, but your Solicitor will not respond to me otherwise.
Thanks to all and I would appreciate any and all viewpoints.
* * * * The statements above are my opinions only, and are to the best of my recollection * * * *
This is big time rubbish…
I own a .org that is named the same as a major bingo company and I promote them exclusively. They are aware and happy, so am I… It’s a win win for us both… That isn’t really relevant on this situation but I must say 32red is really digging into shady territory. Since most of them attorneys are paid on a schedule fee they will probably not retreat but will cost them much more once they lose and run the name into the mud on affiliate forums like this one.
32red get your act together..
