- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
Yes, the first withdrawal is always a pain in the ass there. It’s a great casino with some really cool games, but certainly this will stop players from playing especially if it gets more attention.
My experience: I won about $3k. Withdrew. Failed. Sent ID. Chatted with support. They manually withdrew for me. Then, they reversed that so that I could use the casino interface to withdrawal. It failed. Finally, they did it manually again and I got the $$$.
Their excuse: The withdrawal limit was set to $500 due to bonus abuse auto controls.
Interesting – but I got my money within a few days.
BTW – I can verify that people are definitely making money there. My players are UP, collectively, $4600 – and I have verified that with my players (so it is not shaving in any sense of the word).
Good or bad? Not sure. It’ll bring ’em back
Like I said when I got back from vegas I was inpressed with the software and can see potential here, but the bugs need to be fixed fast and 2nd Tristan needs to answer emails on a more timely fashion, they are growing and will fix all these issues but they best hurry if the Meister fans are on it….lol
They launched too early.
It’s understandable, much time and money invested.
But it’s definitely not smart.
Hi all,
Good or bad? Not sure. It’ll bring ’em back
I said this years ago to Mark at Windows casino and still stand by it today.
If I owned a casino and could cheat in any way possible … it would be to cheat IN favor of the players … letting them win nicely their first or second time out.
I feel extremely confident that the money paid out on those first or second outings would be paid back well over tenfold by about 85% of the people .. if not a higher % than that.
Think about it. You always remember the nice wins … especially at a casino where you haven’t had the crap knocked out of you a bunch of times …. leaving you feeling like you were just catching up if/when you did hit a nice win.
That keeps people coming back again and again. And I’d guess that very few of them … myself included (even though I DO try to keep a loose running count in my head) will have kept score to the point of noticing when they passed the break even point and it will be long after they’ve played and paid a considerable amount more than what was originally won before they finally start thinking to themselves that feeling we all have known at one time or another which is “I’m getting sick and tired of this casino taking my money like it was falling out of my pocket in bundles!”.
Any of the gamblers here will … I think agree with that sentiment.
so ya, I think its definitely a good thing in the long run.
the only way I’d think it wasn’t a good thing would be if it is discovered there’s a flaw in the programming and that the casinos are handing out the money in such fashion … and this fact becomes publicly known. In that case many of the players will wisely pull back on the reigns knowing that the casino hasn’t been offering fair-odds games but rather odds in their favor.
They’ve got to believe their wins came while playing at odds which will still be the same the next time they log in. …. IMHO.
Very interesting post, bb1. I bet the same could work for affiliates.
I bet the same could work for affiliates
at the risk of getting scolded … I take it you’ve never promoted xxxxxx xxxxxxx?
edited by me b4 I got my back side chewed (and admittedly probably would have been deserved)
… besides. that applies to a lot more than just one program anyway
bb1webs wrote:I take it you’ve never promoted xxxxxx xxxxxxx?edited by me b4 I got my back side chewed (and admittedly probably would have been deserved)
Yes. lol.
The Hype thread is now 9 pages long (xhttp://www.casinomeister.com/forums/online-casinos/14652-hype-gaming-thread.html) and there’s some interesting stuff coming out for those who can be bothered to read it. There’s nothing overly alarming, but it certainly leaves me with a slightly uneasy feeling regards promoting them right now.
My reading of it is is that there are a few teething problems, it’s a bit slow paying, the payouts aren’t great and players in general aren’t likely to “stick” once the novelty has worn off as things stand. Conversely, everyone admits the software shows a lot of promise and I feel that if they get their act together, they could contend in the future.
However there’s also a reluctance for the people behind it to lose their anonymity and it’s looking like these are people who have been involved in the industry for some time. Not “bad” people per sé, but perhaps one or two characters who haven’t exactly endeared themselves to people in the past. Hmmmm. Page 7 is where the interesting stuff on the latter starts to come in.
ohhh going now to see, thanks Simmo on the update, I too feel they have promise but the sneaky stuff will not work in their favor they must realize that since they are “old school” in this industry, so who knows what the point of hiding in the closet is.:Cry:
