- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 10, 2006 at 2:29 am #680236
Anonymous
InactiveFortune Affiliates have been the best for me so far. Don’t have any complaints. I have read some bad comments about their CPA program as with 888.com CPA program so I may switch from CPA to Rev. Share sometime. But I think Fortune Affiliates is a good program with good casinos. Their promotions really help in getting sign up, such as the 15 minutes free at 7 Sultans and the 100 free spins at Royal Vegas.
Tyler.
January 10, 2006 at 3:03 am #680239Anonymous
InactiveI am on the poker end of things, and have had some good success with getting real players. Poker player retention has been a differant story, as with all prima sites(exception being crazy poker that offers rakeback) people dont seem to play there long in my experience.
I don’t really promote casinos, but I have ended up with several casino players through fortune affiliates. I have made several hundred dollars, over the 3 years I have been an affiliate, from there casinos(this is more then any other casino). Again, poker is my bread and butter.
I consider them a great program, if I get into the casino end more they will get a lot of my effort. They have good stats, and have always paid me(but kinda late in the month).
ih82lose
Online Poker ReviewJanuary 10, 2006 at 6:07 am #680254Anonymous
InactiveI’ve done ok with them. My experience, while still a bit limited is that casino players tend to come there, deposit a couple hundred, loose it and leave. I do have 1 or 2 players that seem to play a little bit each month, also have a poker player with Royal Vegas that has been consistently playing for the past few months.
January 10, 2006 at 7:48 am #680257Anonymous
InactiveI’m just nosey, and I have to say WHY WOULD ANYONE EVER choose Cpa? Sure you get a chunk of cash now? But I have players already, that I make more than the CPA amounts from per month.. and IM brand new at this!
tyler85 wrote:Fortune Affiliates have been the best for me so far. Don’t have any complaints. I have read some bad comments about their CPA program as with 888.com CPA program so I may switch from CPA to Rev. Share sometime. But I think Fortune Affiliates is a good program with good casinos. Their promotions really help in getting sign up, such as the 15 minutes free at 7 Sultans and the 100 free spins at Royal Vegas.Tyler.
January 10, 2006 at 4:30 pm #680293Anonymous
InactiveThat’s always the debate–money now or money over time.
While you might have some players who do well, the question is what’s best for a large number of signups monthly. If you have a low number of players who generate decent revenue, CPA might end up being the better route.
January 10, 2006 at 7:01 pm #680311Anonymous
InactiveMy thoughts exactly market junction.
But I don’t just use CPA, some programs I use CPA some I use Rev. Share. Since I am fairly new I wanted to try both out, see what is the best. So far CPA has been the best for me, but if I get better at this in the future and get more traffiic and sign ups than it will probably be more wise to switch to Rev. Share.January 10, 2006 at 7:12 pm #680313Anonymous
InactiveI don’t post so much anymore, but this thread was too relevant not to say something. Please allow me to preface my comments with these facts:
- I like Fortune Affiliates…
- I believe Fortune Affiliates are honest…
- They always pay on time…
- I like David Sack and everyone I’ve ever met from Fortune Affiliates… and,
- Fortune Affiliates have always been very good to me.
That said, this topic is about conversions. And, to be honest, I send more traffic to Fortune than any other program. Heck, I’ve done SIX VIDEO reviews I am so committed to supporting them…
However, from my point of view, many other programs are out converting them for about a year now… And, I make much more money from other programs with fewer casinos and less exposure.
I have my theories about why this is. But, as I am re-designing my sites, the thought has crossed my mind that I may be OVER-committed to Fortune and need to diversify my listings a bit more.
January 10, 2006 at 9:04 pm #680336Anonymous
InactiveWell, you guys know about my situation with FA. From all my Micro Casinos, they are and has been my main profitable Casinos. I think it’s different from everyone because if I give the same amount of traffic to (for example) Money Machanic and FA. I might not generate anything from Money Machanic but make a bank from FA. But from everyone at FA, like Lidea, Jaco and all others, they are willing to work with affiliates, so I can’t say anything bad about those guys if they are willing to work with us. :drunk2:January 10, 2006 at 9:26 pm #680340Anonymous
InactiveMoney mechanic is also very nice and willing to work with us.
Fortune surely beats MM, but is not a good performer for me.
Maybe if I had promoted the free spins – but the enormous mass of spam I received (and I still do get it from reggie@gmail almost daily) was so staggering I figured everyone had heard of it long ago and no use promoting it, plus I didn’t want my good name and newsletter associated with all the spam.
So, I have nothing bad to say here about fortune, but nothing good either.
I am on neutral ground now and perhaps I will see the light yet.
January 11, 2006 at 2:11 am #680351Anonymous
InactiveFA has been one of my best performers for about four years. My earnings has increased nicely since I changed to the percentage of deposits model a few months ago.
The 7 Sultans and Royal Vegas promotion has generated some good deposits for me.
David is great to work with! I think I need to give them more exposure.
January 11, 2006 at 10:09 am #680374Anonymous
InactiveI like the people, I like the brands.
However I don’t promote them for one reason alone,
stop the spam.
January 11, 2006 at 12:56 pm #680382Anonymous
InactiveRoyal Vegas and 7Sultans over the last 8 weeks or so are proving to be strong performers, in terms of new signups.
January 11, 2006 at 5:40 pm #680429Anonymous
Inactivetyler85 wrote:My thoughts exactly market junction.
But I don’t just use CPA, some programs I use CPA some I use Rev. Share. Since I am fairly new I wanted to try both out, see what is the best. So far CPA has been the best for me, but if I get better at this in the future and get more traffiic and sign ups than it will probably be more wise to switch to Rev. Share.Just one comment on this: unfortunately you will never know if the player you sent to the casino will earn you more with Rev share than with CPA (if you are signed up with CPA).
I thank a lot of times to Dominique and the others here to explain why rev share better than CPA (and I don’t mention the hassle with CPA account closings, etc..), because if I had signed up with CPA when I started my site, I would have earned far worse than I earn now with rev share. Exactly I earn 3 times more at the moment (examining a 6 months period) than I would have got with CPA. And it will rise, because these players will generate more in the upcoming months/years. To be honest I earned one person’s CPA in 2 months with rev-share (from that person only, not accumulated with other players).
If you need immediate money, then go with CPA, but when things settle, switch to rev share!
January 11, 2006 at 5:49 pm #680435Anonymous
InactiveHey thanks for the suggestion.
When I first started doing this, I think at first I expected to do it for a short time, because I didn’t expect to be very successful. But since I have done pretty good and enjoy it I think I will be doing this for a long time. So I think in the near future I will probably switch to Rev. Share. From all of the comments I have read on here, it is clear that rev. share is the best choice if you are in it for the long term.Tyler.
January 11, 2006 at 8:01 pm #680467Anonymous
InactiveHow well does Fortune Affiliates convert?
aver.
Do you consider them to be a top program?
sure
-
AuthorPosts