- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 5, 2006 at 6:26 am #701099
Anonymous
InactiveIs this for poker? casino?
August 5, 2006 at 11:12 am #701108Anonymous
InactiveIf its casino players then your talking possibly over 100k easy.
August 5, 2006 at 2:17 pm #701122Anonymous
InactiveDepends on where they came from and where you are sending them, but yes, my bet is that you are losing big time.
August 5, 2006 at 8:45 pm #701149Anonymous
InactiveYeah it’s Casino
but for them to make me $100,000 a month let’s say on a 35% rev share
the average player monthly deposit would have to be something like $600…
Is this common!?
Ooooops, hit edit button by mistake! Sorry! dom
August 5, 2006 at 8:51 pm #701150Anonymous
Inactivego with the % rev share deal. it beats cpa in casino for sure…
August 5, 2006 at 10:19 pm #701152Anonymous
InactiveBet22 wrote:Yeah it’s Casinobut for them to make me $100,000 a month let’s say on a 35% rev share
the average player monthly deposit would have to be something like $600…
Is this common!?
You are now talking lifetime value. Not sure what type players you have but switching you would be starting from scratch. You will need to build up a player base. There are players spending thousands per month, and there are players spending 20 bucks.
You don’t really know what yours are like, but apparently the casinos are happy having you on CPA.
That alone tells you that they are making good money off the players they buy from you.
When you have casinos delighted to pay good CPA to you, you can be sure you are the losing party.
In CPA, there is almost always a winner and a loser. When the casino loses they stop paying you.
Having the CPA and the actual player value be even is rare but could conceivably happen.
Not bloody likely though.
August 5, 2006 at 10:47 pm #701155Anonymous
InactiveDepending which casino affiliate program you sent those players to you could switch to revenue and still keep them players, if you could continue to send a high volume of players then i’m sure you could make that happen with a bit of negotiating, it worked for me when i had a large volume of players on my first 2 months on CPA, i was planning to switch anyway but i managed to keep my existing player base. CPA sucks and i knew that but i needed guranteed cash at the time.
August 5, 2006 at 11:17 pm #701158Anonymous
InactiveAlways go with the % rev share deal. CPA sucks!
August 6, 2006 at 4:39 am #701175Anonymous
InactiveFor a poker program at 20% share, $4500 – $5000 a month. Casino players are very lucrative, but look at the CPA that the casinos are giving (especially Golden Palace) and then think that you are getting the SHORT end of the revenue still. I’d say each player is worth quite a bit, but I can’t tell you exacts since I don’t have a big casino player base by any means.
dAn
-
AuthorPosts