- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
cagney12 wrote:According to the banking page on the VP casinos, you can use click2pay or wire……doesn’t mention ach for US . Being you dont have c2p, why not wire?
Actually at Sun Vegas where I was playing they had 5 or 6 different options including ACH, but according to my live chat with support, Click2Pay is the ONLY option for withdrawal by US players.
Nauti Kitten wrote:Actually at Sun Vegas where I was playing they had 5 or 6 different options including ACH, but according to my live chat with support, Click2Pay is the ONLY option for withdrawal by US players.So in other words they will try what ever they can to get money in and will not do a whole lot to insure you can cash out. If anyone has links to that group of casinos I would remove them at once.
Hi Everyone
I got this question from one of my players.
I’d like to hear some comments before I reply to her.=============
Why haven’t the casino’s figured out a way to send your money back (your winnings) via western union, since a lot of them accept western unions as money to play?
============
cheers
the simple truth to that question is they are too damn lazy and it would take a lot of effort to achieve it.
but yes, it could be done. Don’t expect to see it happen though.
Very few if any will go to that extent to serve their customers and I can understand for the most part … IF they aren’t taking in money and don’t have some way to get it back to players.
That said: if a casino takes a player’s deposit, it should either make very clear before they deposit that the player can only get their cashouts IF they are signed up at the appropriate ewallet … or else then yes, they should be willing to go to the extent (if necessary) to send cashouts thru WU .. . but that would require them having multiple persons to send the money because I imagine once WU caught on they were passing along OG cashouts … they’d likely ban that person from sending money thru their system.
bottom line however .. is that there must be a way to pay players … and if it means going to severe means to accomplish this .. well that’s the price of doing biz nowadays … but to take in money and then say .. “we’ll be holding it for you so don’t worry” …. is not going to fly and its going to seriously drag down the reputation of OG
Thus the reason these casinos should come down from your listings ASAP. I have removed most of them from my sites although I admit I’m still trying to catch up with the matter and in fact .. I better go attend to that after writing this ..
Players are paid by NETeller…
As a non-US affiliateI am getting paid by NETeller still… and I dont see why non-US players shuldnt be paid by them too… US players cant play anyways so…
Many US players aren’t being paid.
The casinos are not doing enough to find a way to pay players with a simple check.
It is disgusting.
Jusy a thought here …
Sites and programs are blaming “processing houses” for not wanting to work with them any more … have they considered actually doing it themselves ?
Several of my European sites actually send me a hand-written cheque each month … LADBROKES, PADDY POWER … big sites.
I know it’s a back to basics approach – but as all these casinos operate offshore there should be minimal issues in them opening a checking account and actually physically writing checks for affiliates and players THEMSELVES?
Chequebook, pens, envelopes, stamps … covering letter … and Voila !!
Sure you may need a few more staff, and some quality bookkeeping and it’s far more labour intensive than an electronic solution … but bearing in mind that there is no obvious electronic solution then perhaps it worth a shot?!
Affilaite programs / casino groups that realsie this and start getting the cash flowing may grab significant market share …
:Nod:One needs a bank that will cash the issued check. Many players have been sent checks that were refused by the banks now. We have a banking issue here.
Dominique wrote:One needs a bank that will cash the issued check. Many players have been sent checks that were refused by the banks now. We have a banking issue here.Many players?
:Cry:Apologies – but I hadn’t seen a single one of those posted here – hence the suggestion.
=================
What I did see was a lot of people complaining that their program won’t even try to send checks.
:whoa:TheGooner wrote:Many players?
:Cry:Apologies – but I hadn’t seen a single one of those posted here – hence the suggestion.
=================
What I did see was a lot of people complaining that their program won’t even try to send checks.
:whoa:Players don’t normally post here, it’s an affiliate board.
and none of the affiliates play huh ?
:happydancMeasuring by the # of complaints i’m getting from my users.
They are not!
misterDH wrote:Players are paid by NETeller…As a non-US affiliateI am getting paid by NETeller still… and I dont see why non-US players shuldnt be paid by them too… US players cant play anyways so…
I would seriously think about switching to a less risky payment solution. If Neteller goes belly up then your money will be at risk as well. Just take a look at the share price. If that is any reflection of economic reality then Neteller is heading for the sewer.
http://www.casinoaffiliateprograms.com/bb/web-merchants-checks-bouncing.18260.html?
TheGooner wrote:Many players?
:Cry:Apologies – but I hadn’t seen a single one of those posted here – hence the suggestion.
=================
What I did see was a lot of people complaining that their program won’t even try to send checks.
:whoa:We have a banking issue here.
all due respect Dom, its a laziness issue.
there is NO way the banks can keep up with knowing that an account belongs to a casino if they keep opening new accounts under different names and paying that way.
Yes that is labor intensive. But it is possible and IS being done. I just received and cashed a check the other day for winnings.
the simple fact is that this is the cost of doing business nowdays.
Not so long ago when offshore sportsbooks first came onto the picture, you had to send and recieve money WU.
They had different names you sent the money to on a regular basis. I know this because I did it again and again and it always worked.
Then came the ability to use credit cards and eventually it went to ewallets.
Now I’m not argueing the fact this can be considered money laundering and all that. But the point is that this is a situation that should be on the player to decide whether they want to risk. The casino’s job is to get the money to the player. They are not responsible for the player’s situation after they get the money. We are after all talking about adults here who SHOULD have the right to make their own decisions on what they are and aren’t willing to risk.
right now, …. not one person has ever been prosecuted for recieving funds for a gambling win. (which I also point out would be very hard to prove if done correctly).
