- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
So this means that it is not law yet. 888, Party Gaming and the likes should have waited before making ridiculous statements.
Right. That is why this is most likely based on other motives, like takeovers and acquisitions. Nothing else really makes any sense at all.
hdaddy wrote:Right. That is why this is most likely based on other motives, like takeovers and acquisitions. Nothing else really makes any sense at all.Yes, that’s true. I’m seing that something is behind the scenes.
A bill that blocks transactions is approved Friday. 2 days after, companies make this kind of statements. They worked for 10 years on grey area, and a new bill that is not law yet, and which is short on the matter of ilegalizing online gambling, scares them. Well, my friends, they are hiding something for sure. I just don’t know what, yet.
Does anyone have a link to the actual bill? A lawyer friend wants to look through it.
Thanks.
That link doesn’t work – it looks shortened..
It works now, but here it is again.
http://www.rules.house.gov/109_2nd/text/hr4954cr/hr49543_portscr.pdf
From what I’ve learned from Jon Stewart, there is a step between Congress and the President… which is lobbying.
AdioKing wrote:From what I’ve learned from Jon Stewart, there is a step between Congress and the President… which is lobbying.They cant alter the bill now, he either signs it for national security or he doesnt.
Oh yeah and theres that gambling thing hanging off the back of it.That would be one hell of a lobby.
