- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 30, 2006 at 7:06 pm #704049
Anonymous
InactiveThat’s insane.. I mentioned that I am sponsored for both hotel and CAC pass. I do not pull in mid to high numbers for any program.
In fact, I pull in an average of: $3200 / month for the program that sponsored me and I am quite confident they would have paid for flight as well had I requested it.
I thought about promoting Vegas Affiliates – but after those threads that you mentioned, I decided against it. I don’t want to deal with Henry and his strange attitude.
August 30, 2006 at 10:37 pm #704083Anonymous
InactiveEngineer wrote:(1) The 25% commission rate sucks compared to other programs where I can earn 30% and 35% right away.I agree this Henry is a dick, but just curious about this quote. I am not aware of any Microgaming program that pays this.
August 31, 2006 at 1:03 am #704094Anonymous
InactiveBJF wrote:I agree this Henry is a dick, but just curious about this quote. I am not aware of any Microgaming program that pays this.I just checked my spreadsheet, and you are right — pretty much every MGS program pays 25% to start. The exceptions, as far as I know:Vegas Partner: 27%
Villento: 28% (new aff program)
Casino Rewards: 35%:satisfied
August 31, 2006 at 2:19 am #704096Anonymous
InactiveYou can’t get 35% at Casino Rewards anymore. They have that new wager -share model for all new players. Referback is 23% after they scrape about 8% off the gross win. Only 18% if you don’t bring a new player for the month. The new G3 – Grand Monace might be 30%. Not sure.
August 31, 2006 at 2:25 am #704097Anonymous
InactiveVegas affs used to be a real nice program back in Stefano’s day, and Pierrick was good too. It has been deteriorating badly.
August 31, 2006 at 3:16 am #704099Anonymous
InactiveG3 is offering 30% for 3 months, but then it defaults to 25%.
Re: Casino Rewards — I thought the wager model equated to 35% for most affiliates? I wish they would show us the deposit amounts; then we would have a better idea.
August 31, 2006 at 3:19 pm #704141Anonymous
InactiveAs far as I can tell it adds up to at least 35% at rewards, I have a nice increase in earnings per player with this model from the 35% before. Mostly slot players though, they do very well on this model.
Once you start earning, you can always ask for a better %.
August 31, 2006 at 3:21 pm #704143
vladcizsolMemberHenry is definately a tool…
September 1, 2006 at 7:25 pm #704276Anonymous
InactiveQuote:I was going to increase their exposure next month if they did this for me. Now, though, I’m thinking I might pull them down completely.So, you want to jeopardize $7500 / month for a one time Vegas trip?
I’m no fan of Vegas Aff, but I think you should keep this in perspective. I mean… they aren’t even going, so it isn’t like they’re specifically being mean to you.
I actually laughed when I read Marc suggesting you should offer all of your traffic up to someone else just so you can get to his conference for free. If he really thinks it’s that important to be there, he should be sending you the Vegas package himself.
If you want to leave for all of the other reasons, by all means, go ahead.
Quote:Henry acts like a dick most of the time.lol. You’d think programs would discourage that.
September 1, 2006 at 7:46 pm #704278Anonymous
InactiveOneguy2nv wrote:I mean… they aren’t even going, so it isn’t like they’re specifically being mean to you.That’s what I was thinking as well. They have no incentive comping somebody if all they are doing is sending you to meet other programs etc.
I think it is a very valid reason not to comp somebody.
September 1, 2006 at 8:43 pm #704282Anonymous
InactiveYou guys are probably right.
At the time, I was miffed by the rejection. I am not pulling them down. It would be stupid to throw away the income over something like this. The program itself is pretty good compared to many others out there. The casinos convert well for me, there aren’t any spam or rogue issues, the casinos aren’t bundled, negatives aren’t carried over……… Granted, the creatives are older than dirt, payments are slow, and Henry is in charge — but these aren’t good enough reasons for me to completely dump a program.
Making retroactive changes — now that is dumpworthy. Being unprofitable for 6 months — also dumpworthy. Turing down a request for freebies — not dumpworthy.
If he really thinks it’s that important to be there, he should be sending you the Vegas package himself.
LOL! I like that. :tongue:
September 1, 2006 at 9:02 pm #704288Anonymous
InactiveI was very confused by the latest Casinomeister newsletter where he referred several times to Vegas Poker and Vegas Joker. I know Vegas Joker the Vegas Affiliates casino, but not a casino named Vegas Poker. This was very bad and a player had money stolen for “bonus abuse”. Anyone know more about his?
September 2, 2006 at 12:48 am #704302Anonymous
InactiveVegas Poker is a casino thats owned by the same mini vegas group, but is not promoted by affiliates.
-
AuthorPosts