- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
Yes, it is a good post about a very common misconception.
It is only a penalty only in the sense that you are not rewarded for copying the same old thing onto different sites.Sounds like a term that the IRS would come up with.
Really if your article is stolen, it should count as a reference and increase the score of the original page don’t you think?
@bingoadvantage 238874 wrote:
Really if your article is stolen, it should count as a reference and increase the score of the original page don’t you think?
Totally agree. It definitely says something good about the site being copied.
@Play 238885 wrote:
Totally agree. It definitely says something good about the site being copied.
Absolutely.
A new way to build authority ‘stealability’.
And then when you get repeatedly hacked, it’s ‘tarketability’.That’s what we need is an ‘anti-google algorithmics’ or a ‘google2too’.
Now, then who wants to trade thefts and rank high on that index measure.
(PS Just kidding:) )
