- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
I second Dominique’s query are we to post all information in this regard? Can cpays take control of this issue before it gets out of hand? Personally I don’t lavish in the idea of destroying programs. greek39
Hi greek39 and Dominique,
Can you please elaborate on this issue so i will know my way of action regarding this issue?
Thanks,
Eilon
CPays Manager,
manager at cpays.com
http://www.cpays.comI have collected all kinds of info all the way down to IPs.
If I can do it, you can do it.
Might be a good idea not to post all this publicly, I don’t care to go through another episode like 888.
It would be a good idea if you just took note that we have noticed and did something about it without a big mess.
I can’t speak for everyone here on CAP. But In previous post cpays claimed it will take care of scrapers via closing their accounts ect… There are two approaches to this problem. One I can post roughly a thousand scraped redirect pages or I can continue on my way. Second I can leave it up to cpays to weed out these people on their own.
I do not want to take the first approach, because it takes precious time. I will be bold enough to say that cpays still and always will have some tuff issues to deal with.
Eilon I beleive you are quite familiar with me, and know how these unethical practices takes me places I would rather not go. I have spent close to year on this stuff and am close to packin it all in.
Things have been peaceful around hear lately I have noticed I would like to keep it that way. greek39
I dont know about any possible “copy and paste” issues, but I just had to give the promps to the boys. It’s acctually very clean SEoptimization.
Unfortunatelly the idea has become wide spread and it’s a matter of time before google catches on to it; plus the irrelevance of the links might be bad in a long term…
Scrapers are not being closed if anything there are more and more coming and that Glowing Casino, all I can say is WOW!
