- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
Looks great, very clean. However, it took almost 20 seconds to load and I’m on DSL (total size of page is 262537 bytes). Also, I counted about 96 HTML 4.01 validation errors which you may want to address.
Anyway, best of luck.
Hi Pit, thanks for visiting my page!
About the errors, I used the link checker for errors (it also searches html errors) and it said page was ok. Probably my bad, I will do more research.
About the speed – I wonder if everyone else get the same results? It seems to load much slower with Mozilla.Brgds,
R.Yes…same slow loading time
Looks very, very good, but I have to concur with the “loads slow” opinions. If I had clicked to the site from search results for example, I might not wait for that long.
-mikko
fun bingo sitesI am also on DSL and took a long while to load myself.
Not well versed enough to offer suggestions but I can see where this could cause issues.
Once is does load it is very sharp and well organized site. Nice job!
Far far to slow to pop something up. About 15-20 seconds for me.
You need to be able to display something to keep people interested and informed that it is not “just another dead link”.
Even the link jumps took 4-5 seconds.
Some random thoughts :
– The front page is fine when it loads
– the main editorial is a nice chatty style that I liked.
– sidebar links are scruffy and article titles too long.Overall a reasonable site – a solid 6/10
:xmas:Well whats one more review? I give it 7/10 for having content and banners to the side. I don’t really care for sites that confuse me, this one does not.
Viewing your source it appears:
Content-Language > Outside of HEAD.
Content-Type http-equiv text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 > Outside of HEAD.
description name > Outside of HEAD.
generator name bronn.ee > Outside of HEAD.
keywords > Outside of HEAD.All these tags should be in the head area. This error can happen if you create to Two sets of head tags in the same doct page. This is the way I think the bots will view it. Its rare I see code like that it is very wacked. This might expiain the load time?
Grammar:
but there’s still happens to be lackness of safety > lack of safety
Well I didn’t spend much time on it but I hope this helps a little. I only looked at your home page. There is a broken link somewhere with extension 22? greek39
Thank you so much for the reviews :happydanc
I’ll start fixing it (read: whipping my coder) right away. Hope you guys will be revisiting again when I get it done.Brgds,
R.
