- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 12, 2007 at 11:15 pm #722358
Anonymous
InactiveOh man, no reefers, that takes all the fun out of it!
January 13, 2007 at 1:00 am #722369Anonymous
Inactivelol @ Dom!:laughing:
January 13, 2007 at 6:00 am #722391Anonymous
GuestHi all,
so joking aside: they’ve decided to stick to the predatory approach?
too bad. More fish in the sea and all that.
January 13, 2007 at 1:44 pm #722417Anonymous
Inactivebb1webs wrote:Hi all,so joking aside: they’ve decided to stick to the predatory approach?
too bad. More fish in the sea and all that.
With the new review process, we must give Gambling Wages a bit of time to discuss their terms and take a position. We will hopefully get to that next week and determine the path from there.
January 26, 2007 at 3:06 am #724429Anonymous
InactiveTuesday (January 23rd) was the day that Nicolas of Gambling Wages was to give us a little more information on the predatory terms and if they might be amended, according to our brief conversation over a week ago.
With the big event in London, we feel that additional time is warranted and we look forward to a very productive discussion in the near future!
Nicholas / Natalie – We look forward to hearing from you when you return from London.
Have a great time!
February 7, 2007 at 2:07 am #726339Anonymous
InactiveWe have not heard from Gambling Wages at all
There will be one last attempt at contact and then their program will be set as Predatory at AffiliateGuardDog.comPredatory: Any program who has Terms and Conditions which allow them to easily take advantage of their affiliates.
Nicholas / Natalie – Please either PM me here at CAP or at AffiliateGuardDog.com with the account given to you.
Thank You
-
AuthorPosts