- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
I agree with you led that visitors should count , so many reasons our traffic dont convert .Right now rtg casinos are horrible and they admit they have processor issues .Sometimes the casinos reutation affects it too so i dont think affiliatesin general should be punished.Life time earnings is exactly that.
Most importantly, a contract is a contract. Without valid contracts there is no decent business. Breach of contract cannot be tolerated.
If “revenue for life ” is advertised, it needs to be adhered to.
Programs need to clearly state what the contract is, we can then decide whether we accept that contract or not.
Changing the contract retroactively is not accpetable under any circumstances, regardless of whether a clause about “changing the T&C at will” is included or not. This clause would not stand up under any civilized jurisdiction in the world.
Reasons for account closure need to be clearly defined in the T&C, and they cannot be changed at will.
Affiliate Guard Dog considers it predatory if “quota” clauses ( that threaten to stop paying you alltogether if you don’t send x number of new players in a given period) are included. I agree with this.
The point of rev share in this business IMO is to build up a good player base. Without you, the program would not have the player. For that player, you deserve continued payment.
Should the program find it impossible to contact the affiliate for payment, and after all venues are exhausted, it would be ok to close the account after a given time period. However, should the affiliate return, the account needs to be reopened and monies paid.
That’s my opinion and criteria and I will not consider programs who act in a predatory way.
Who knows, I may get run over by a truck tomorrow and spend several months in the hospital. I don’t want anyone stealing my rightfully earned income while I am incapacitated.
We work without any benefits, no insurance, no base salary, no social security, and we make nothing for our work unless we produce income for the program.
This income we produce – we deserve our share of it. Period.
I have to agree with the points made in this entire thread so far.
Hey Dom, look both ways before crossing that street.
Rick
Universal4I agree . Some like myself struggle every day trying to improve . Learning this whole web affiliate thing is much harder than I would ever had realized .
It’s not the affiliates fault when a visitor don’t deposit no more than it is when a player decides to leave a site that he/she doesn’t like. That’s my opinion anyway .I don’t believe I could have said it any better, Dom!
Well said Dom!
As long as payment information remains updated, affiliates should be paid their share of any revenue generated from a player they sent. It is as simple as that. There should be no exceptions. Any program that tries to implement terms containing an “activity clause” should not only be avoided, but should be blacklisted for such practices.
