- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
Good work mate.
Anyone up for some discussion ?
Am I correct in assuming that the addition of clause 4.4 now makes Euro Partners a “predatory” program?
And what about the withdrawal of the no-rackback clause … isn’t that a negative sign that they’re now giving tacit endorsement for rackback affilaites ?
Two signs that this program has headed down the “dark side”.
:Cry:TheGooner wrote:Good work mate.Anyone up for some discussion ?
Am I correct in assuming that the addition of clause 4.4 now makes Euro Partners a “predatory” program?
And what about the withdrawal of the no-rackback clause … isn’t that a negative sign that they’re now giving tacit endorsement for rackback affilaites ?
Two signs that this program has headed down the “dark side”.
:Cry:I see a lot of programs with a similar term, but usually it doesn’t use the word ‘possible’. I find that word strange and alarming.
As far as predatory, I consider their offensive use of spammers to be predatory. Especially since those spammers are stealing our hard work. Their terms are a bit strange in a couple of areas as you can see at AffiliateGuardDog.com – but their spam work is what gives them the ‘predatory’ name. With the removal of the rackback term and the addition of the ‘possible fraud’ clause – I think their terms are also moving in the predatory direction.
To furthur the discussion…
Is this a retroactive change? If so, does this mean older affiliates cannot do rakeback and newer affiliates can? Older affiliates can market to the US, but new affiliates cannot?
I assume that all are retroactive – but would certainly like a little clarification.
I read them as retroactive and I find them to be “alarming” and on the edge of predatory but that is just my opinion..lol I don’t like the spam and how this whole program works to begin with and the rakeback change is to me very retroactive.
